I know, I know, soccer sucks right? Wrong! (well maybe MLS sucks, but not the World Cup) No commercials, country versus country and it only happens every four years. Unfortunately, since it is in Germany the games start in the morning so any of you productive people will only be able to watch on the weekends. But hey its a great excuse to begin drinking at 7 a.m.
GOOOAAAAALLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Germany just scored)
Friday, June 09, 2006
Saturday, June 03, 2006
Jose Luis Castillo Disgraces Boxing
Well my Saturday night has been ruined. For months I have been anticipating the third fight between Diego "Chico" Corrales and Jose Luis Castillo, but Castillo failed to make weight. He also did not make weight for the second fight (which he won be KO) but this time Coralles refused to fight him. The problem is that Castillo has been saying for weeks that he is on schedule to make weight and that it would not be a problem this fight. Castillo came in at 140lbs which is a full division above 135. Five pounds may not seem like much but in boxing it is crucial.Kudos to Corrales because he could have gotten seriously injured. Castillo's promoter Bob Arum is out more than a million dollars before the lawsuits, which will come. Likewise, Castillo is facing lawsuits and sanctions from Corrales, his management the NSAC and Showtime.
This is horrible for boxing and horrible for fans that shelled out big bucks for air fare and hotels. Castillo needs to be suspended for at least one year.
This is horrible for boxing and horrible for fans that shelled out big bucks for air fare and hotels. Castillo needs to be suspended for at least one year.
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Is CNN intentionally mistranslating?
According to this they just might be.
CNN translation:
Iran has a right to develop nuclear technology and the international community should drop its demands that Tehran prove it's not trying to build a nuclear weapon, Iraq's foreign minister said Friday.
[…]
"Iran doesn't claim that they want to obtain a nuclear weapon or a nuclear bomb, so there is no need that we ask them for any guarantee now," Hoshyar Zebari said after meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki.
Omar's Translation:
We respect Iran's and every other nation's right to pursue nuclear technology for research purposes and peaceful use given they accept [giving] the internationally required guarantees that this will not lead to an armament race in the region…
CNN translation:
Iran has a right to develop nuclear technology and the international community should drop its demands that Tehran prove it's not trying to build a nuclear weapon, Iraq's foreign minister said Friday.
[…]
"Iran doesn't claim that they want to obtain a nuclear weapon or a nuclear bomb, so there is no need that we ask them for any guarantee now," Hoshyar Zebari said after meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki.
Omar's Translation:
We respect Iran's and every other nation's right to pursue nuclear technology for research purposes and peaceful use given they accept [giving] the internationally required guarantees that this will not lead to an armament race in the region…
Friday, May 19, 2006
True Courage (& Good Reading)
For those of you who have not checked out the blog, "Iraq the model" do so!
Here is just a snipet of the latest post:
The other day I was with some friends at home and the subject eventually surfaced "let's just wait for another six months, I'm sure things will improve by then" one friend said and I nodded in agreement "I'm not willing to take the risk, what if I get killed or kidnapped tomorrow or next month!? I'm leaving Iraq to live somewhere else until I believe it's safe to return, we live only once guys!" and I nodded in agreement too.
Both opinions make a lot of sense and I could never say the first friend was a coward since he's still living through what I and the other friend are living through.
I can see the light at the end of the tunnel and so do many people but they wonder if the tunnel is going to collapse before we reach its end.
Here is just a snipet of the latest post:
The other day I was with some friends at home and the subject eventually surfaced "let's just wait for another six months, I'm sure things will improve by then" one friend said and I nodded in agreement "I'm not willing to take the risk, what if I get killed or kidnapped tomorrow or next month!? I'm leaving Iraq to live somewhere else until I believe it's safe to return, we live only once guys!" and I nodded in agreement too.
Both opinions make a lot of sense and I could never say the first friend was a coward since he's still living through what I and the other friend are living through.
I can see the light at the end of the tunnel and so do many people but they wonder if the tunnel is going to collapse before we reach its end.
Happy Birthday Malcolm X
“Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you send him to the cemetery.”
Malcolm X is perhaps the most misunderstood American in the history of this country. Many say that he is a hate-monger or that he preached violence, but nothing could be further from the truth. Malcolm never preached violence; he only advocated the use of violence for self-defense. This is not a hateful message rather it is common sense. Malcolm X is only saying things that most parents teach their children at a young age.
But if you say, you can still pass the violations over, then I ask, Hath your house been burnt? Hath your property been destroyed before your face? Are your wife and children destitute of a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have you lost a parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the ruined wretched survivor? If you have not, then you are not a judge of those who have. But if you have, and can still shake hands with the murderers, then you are unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend, or lover, and whatever rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward, and the spirit of a sycophant…
Thomas Paine, Common Sense 1776
Certainly, no American would claim that Paine was a hate monger or that he preached violence. Quite the contrary, he is regarded as an American Patriot and rightfully so. King George treated the colonists much better than white society treated black society. Therefore, when Malcolm said that he wanted freedom, justice and equality by any means necessary he was echoing the sentiments that American patriots had always professed.
I cannot understand why many Americans, especially conservatives are so hostile to Malcolm X. I suppose that much of the contempt directed at Malcolm X stems from his early views on whites. He believed that they were all devils. This twisted view was shaped by the Nation of Islam. However, Malcolm abandoned this racist ideology after making a religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Likewise, many detest his anti-capitalism rhetoric. I suspect his economic views would change if he witnessed the fall of the Berlin wall and the Soviet Union. Many people believed that capitalism was a zero-sum game however this idea seems to have vanished from the mainstream. Even though he completely changed his racist views he knew that his image would be exploited in death.
"He will make use of me dead, as he has made use of me alive, as a convenient symbol of hatred"
Malcolm X is perhaps the most misunderstood American in the history of this country. Many say that he is a hate-monger or that he preached violence, but nothing could be further from the truth. Malcolm never preached violence; he only advocated the use of violence for self-defense. This is not a hateful message rather it is common sense. Malcolm X is only saying things that most parents teach their children at a young age.
But if you say, you can still pass the violations over, then I ask, Hath your house been burnt? Hath your property been destroyed before your face? Are your wife and children destitute of a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have you lost a parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the ruined wretched survivor? If you have not, then you are not a judge of those who have. But if you have, and can still shake hands with the murderers, then you are unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend, or lover, and whatever rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward, and the spirit of a sycophant…
Thomas Paine, Common Sense 1776
Certainly, no American would claim that Paine was a hate monger or that he preached violence. Quite the contrary, he is regarded as an American Patriot and rightfully so. King George treated the colonists much better than white society treated black society. Therefore, when Malcolm said that he wanted freedom, justice and equality by any means necessary he was echoing the sentiments that American patriots had always professed.
I cannot understand why many Americans, especially conservatives are so hostile to Malcolm X. I suppose that much of the contempt directed at Malcolm X stems from his early views on whites. He believed that they were all devils. This twisted view was shaped by the Nation of Islam. However, Malcolm abandoned this racist ideology after making a religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Likewise, many detest his anti-capitalism rhetoric. I suspect his economic views would change if he witnessed the fall of the Berlin wall and the Soviet Union. Many people believed that capitalism was a zero-sum game however this idea seems to have vanished from the mainstream. Even though he completely changed his racist views he knew that his image would be exploited in death.
"He will make use of me dead, as he has made use of me alive, as a convenient symbol of hatred"
Tie a yellow ribbon, on your shirt?????
Well it is official, Iran lawmakers passed a law that would force Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear cloth identifiers.
Iran's roughly 25,000 Jews would have to sew a yellow strip of cloth on the front of their clothes, while Christians would wear red badges and Zoroastrians would be forced to wear blue cloth.
Update: Story is starting to seem fake
Update: Story is bogus!
Iran's roughly 25,000 Jews would have to sew a yellow strip of cloth on the front of their clothes, while Christians would wear red badges and Zoroastrians would be forced to wear blue cloth.
Update: Story is starting to seem fake
Update: Story is bogus!
Thursday, May 18, 2006
The Great Emancipator
No not honest Abe, but Niccolo Machiavelli. He could be considered one of the most influential people ever. His influence has expanded for more than 450 years. His name has become a popular adjective and Tupac, even informally changed his name to Makeveli in honor the philosopher. Machiavelli did much more than influence Tupac, he also inspired some of the most influential philosophers of the ensuing centuries, such as Locke, Rousseau, Marx and Nietzsche.
Although many consider Machiavelli a teacher of evil, I consider him the founder of political science. It is true that The Prince, did promote many controversial ideas, but he was simply approaching politics scientifically. Machiavelli wrote in a time that did not allow free expression of ideas. He invited change, dismissed limitations, advocated for the protection of property, created an historical analysis of maintaining power and even exposed the limitations of Christian morals.
Machiavelli lived in the 15th and 16th century two hundred years before the enlightenment. In these centuries, Aristotle was dogma and the church used force to suppress knowledge. He did not have the freedom to speak freely in the way that Locke, Rousseau, Marx and Nietzsche did. He was required to veil the true meaning behind his words while they could freely expand on every concept. It would have been suicide for Machiavelli to attempt to expand on the ideas promoted in The Prince. Yet he was able to emancipate politics from the philosophical good, which Socrates and Plato had imposed.
Although many consider Machiavelli a teacher of evil, I consider him the founder of political science. It is true that The Prince, did promote many controversial ideas, but he was simply approaching politics scientifically. Machiavelli wrote in a time that did not allow free expression of ideas. He invited change, dismissed limitations, advocated for the protection of property, created an historical analysis of maintaining power and even exposed the limitations of Christian morals.
Machiavelli lived in the 15th and 16th century two hundred years before the enlightenment. In these centuries, Aristotle was dogma and the church used force to suppress knowledge. He did not have the freedom to speak freely in the way that Locke, Rousseau, Marx and Nietzsche did. He was required to veil the true meaning behind his words while they could freely expand on every concept. It would have been suicide for Machiavelli to attempt to expand on the ideas promoted in The Prince. Yet he was able to emancipate politics from the philosophical good, which Socrates and Plato had imposed.
Friday, May 12, 2006
Global Warming
Far be it from me to play scientist. Generally I am a skeptic on most contested theories until I see real proof. However, this article is interesting.
Friday, May 05, 2006
Al Gore???
Wow, the liberals never cease to amaze me. For about the last two weeks the libs at the Huffington Post have been asking Hillary to step aside because she is unelectable. On the surface this seems logical, but they believe that Al Gore should be the democrat to run because he is electable. Huh???? If Al Gore does not epitimize "LOSER" then I don't know who does.
Please Run Gore, Please.
Please Run Gore, Please.
Thursday, May 04, 2006
Like Father, Like Son, Like Family
It seems that Patrick Kennedy a Democrat member of congress from Rhode Island, oh and the son of Ted Kennedy, was involved in a car accident at 2:45 a.m. Apparently the officers on the scene were not allowed to administer a sobriety test.
Boy the Kennedy family sure turned out to be one big piece of crap!
Boy the Kennedy family sure turned out to be one big piece of crap!
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Moussaoui
It's decided then life in prison. Before anyone starts with the "we should not make a martyr out of him, this is real punishment, bit." Consider for a second that he now will be free to attend the Mosque weekly while preaching his brand of extremist Islam. He will have a life time to recruit disenfranchised Muslims to the terrorist cause. Hopefully, we can get some frontier justice (ie: tooth brush to the neck) but I am not holding my breath. After the verdict was read Moussaoui said "America, you lost. I won." He clapped his hands as he was escorted away.
Sure did not seem like he wanted the death penalty. The jurors believed that his role was not significant enough to warrant death. While I was not on the jury, it seems that if we catch an Al Qaeda terrorist that admits and rejoices to being a terrorist the least we can do is oblige him with death.
Update: it appears that Moussaoui is going to super max, not sure how long he will be classified as a super max prisoner or how long it will be until the Frenchies try and get him transferred to France. I still think he should have received the death penalty. I think that people who admit to being Al Qaeda in court should be put to death.
Sure did not seem like he wanted the death penalty. The jurors believed that his role was not significant enough to warrant death. While I was not on the jury, it seems that if we catch an Al Qaeda terrorist that admits and rejoices to being a terrorist the least we can do is oblige him with death.
Update: it appears that Moussaoui is going to super max, not sure how long he will be classified as a super max prisoner or how long it will be until the Frenchies try and get him transferred to France. I still think he should have received the death penalty. I think that people who admit to being Al Qaeda in court should be put to death.
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
A Day without an Immigrant
It's official, it seems that everyone enjoyed their day! Maybe next time they can do a year without an immigrant.
If they continue to hold these rallies and let radical groups such as the Brown Berets and Mecha speak for them they will be banned for sure. Since groups like Mecha and the Brown Berets think that there should be no borders, we should send their asses right over it.
As an American of Mexican descent, I find it treasonous to hear immigrants or other "Latinos" claim the South West should go back to Mexico. Uh no! Mexico already got its ass kicked once, I don't think they want another taste. The borders of Mexico were created by a European power. There was no such thing as Mexico before the Spanish invaded and took over. Don't these idiots realize that Spanish is the language of the Conquistadors? Spain is in Europe, fools!
To be clear, I am in favor of immigration for ecomical reasons (such as the 78 million baby boomers that are about to retire and suck social security and medicare dry) but the more illegal immigrants take to the streets, allowing some to make wild statements such as reuniting Mexico, the more inclined I am to stop immigration. Maybe we can force the old people to work if they want their social security check.
If they continue to hold these rallies and let radical groups such as the Brown Berets and Mecha speak for them they will be banned for sure. Since groups like Mecha and the Brown Berets think that there should be no borders, we should send their asses right over it.
As an American of Mexican descent, I find it treasonous to hear immigrants or other "Latinos" claim the South West should go back to Mexico. Uh no! Mexico already got its ass kicked once, I don't think they want another taste. The borders of Mexico were created by a European power. There was no such thing as Mexico before the Spanish invaded and took over. Don't these idiots realize that Spanish is the language of the Conquistadors? Spain is in Europe, fools!
To be clear, I am in favor of immigration for ecomical reasons (such as the 78 million baby boomers that are about to retire and suck social security and medicare dry) but the more illegal immigrants take to the streets, allowing some to make wild statements such as reuniting Mexico, the more inclined I am to stop immigration. Maybe we can force the old people to work if they want their social security check.
Monday, May 01, 2006
War on Drugs (updated)
Mexico is proposing a bill decriminalizing small amounts of Marijuana, Cocaine, Heroin and Ecstacy. The politicians of San Diego are outraged.
"I'm going to call this action what it is, appallingly stupid, reckless and incredibly dangerous." San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders. As stupid as our short-sighted politicians?
It is official, Mexicans can be Americanized. Now we both have amazingly stupid politicians!
This is not to say that I believe all drugs should be legal. Just that I think the war on drugs is extremely ineffective and is wasting tax dollars. There has to be a better way to do this. (OK I am still pissed that the privatation of social security did not pass & I believe that is appallingly stupid, reckless and incredibly dangerous)
"I'm going to call this action what it is, appallingly stupid, reckless and incredibly dangerous." San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders. As stupid as our short-sighted politicians?
It is official, Mexicans can be Americanized. Now we both have amazingly stupid politicians!
This is not to say that I believe all drugs should be legal. Just that I think the war on drugs is extremely ineffective and is wasting tax dollars. There has to be a better way to do this. (OK I am still pissed that the privatation of social security did not pass & I believe that is appallingly stupid, reckless and incredibly dangerous)
Sudan
Watching coverage of the recent protests about the genocide in the Sudan, I cannot figure out why the protestors do not reiterate the point that the murderers are Islamic Arabs killing black Africans. If this was Jews stealing their land it would be on the front page of every paper and every liberal would be outraged. Maybe the blacks don't mind the Arabs stealing African land, after all they aren't white.
United 93
Against my better judgement I braved the movies for the first time in almost 1 year. Instantly I remembered why I don't go to the movies. One lady brought her new born baby, while the kid next to me chatted on his cell.
Anyways on to the movie... I was not impressed. Granted, I am a 9-11 junkie so I had already saw the A&E made for tv movie about United 93, every thing put out by National Geographic, as well as every documentary I can get my hands on about 9-11, so perhaps I am a tad desensatized now. There was nothing new, still there were some dramatic parts. The passangers attacking the terrorists and the terrorists attacking the crew come to mind. If you hate the going to the movies as I do, you can wait until it is out on DVD.
Anyways on to the movie... I was not impressed. Granted, I am a 9-11 junkie so I had already saw the A&E made for tv movie about United 93, every thing put out by National Geographic, as well as every documentary I can get my hands on about 9-11, so perhaps I am a tad desensatized now. There was nothing new, still there were some dramatic parts. The passangers attacking the terrorists and the terrorists attacking the crew come to mind. If you hate the going to the movies as I do, you can wait until it is out on DVD.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Gas Hysteria
Although I do not like the rapid increase in gas prices, I am shocked to hear so many "conservatives" call for the government to investigate this. I hear them say that they are making too much profit. That smacks of Communism to me. If one were to look at this objectively then they would see that adjusted for infaltion gas is as cheap today as it was 25 years ago. I got this chart from Instapundit.
I think people should examine the price of movie tickets, comic books, soda, hell houses or cars or any product 25 years ago and see if gas is significantly higher. It is not. Get over it people prices rise. The cheapness of our gas causes many to waste it and maybe the increase will cause us to use energy more wisely.
I think people should examine the price of movie tickets, comic books, soda, hell houses or cars or any product 25 years ago and see if gas is significantly higher. It is not. Get over it people prices rise. The cheapness of our gas causes many to waste it and maybe the increase will cause us to use energy more wisely.
Monday, April 24, 2006
Babies in Prison
CNN just covered a story about a California womens prison which is about to introduce a new program that will allow women in prison to keep their newborn babies in a special facility will they will learn parenting skills and receive drug treatment.
"Just because were in here doesn’t mean were bad mothers,” Lucinda Hernandez
Uh, Wrong! That is exactly what it means. This is outrageous, the babies need to be stripped from these unfit mothers. These babies should be either placed with family or put up for adoption. The mothers must first kick their drug habits and get out of jail before they are allowed the chance to raise their children.
"Just because were in here doesn’t mean were bad mothers,” Lucinda Hernandez
Uh, Wrong! That is exactly what it means. This is outrageous, the babies need to be stripped from these unfit mothers. These babies should be either placed with family or put up for adoption. The mothers must first kick their drug habits and get out of jail before they are allowed the chance to raise their children.
Thursday, April 20, 2006
Common Sense
Ann Coulter's new column is pricless. Here ia the best stuff:
However the Duke lacrosse rape case turns out, one lesson that absolutely will not be learned is this: You can severely reduce your chances of having a false accusation of rape leveled against you if you don't hire strange women to come to your house and take their clothes off for money.
Also, you can severely reduce your chances of being raped if you do not go to strange men's houses and take your clothes off for money. (Does anyone else detect a common thread here?
I could not agree more.
However the Duke lacrosse rape case turns out, one lesson that absolutely will not be learned is this: You can severely reduce your chances of having a false accusation of rape leveled against you if you don't hire strange women to come to your house and take their clothes off for money.
Also, you can severely reduce your chances of being raped if you do not go to strange men's houses and take your clothes off for money. (Does anyone else detect a common thread here?
I could not agree more.
Now I am really starting to like China
I know this is not a popular opinion but I am really starting to like China. During the ceremony introducing the Hu Jintao the President of China a protestor began shouting that his days were numbered, and asking Bush to stop his killing. Usually it is Bush being screamed down by left wing wackos in foreign countries, it was refreshing to see someone esle being yelled at. I can already see the wackos in Europe, burning effigies of him during his visits.
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Terrorist Professor
The terrorist professor made famous by going on the O'Reilly factor plead guilty to supporting terrorists and will recieve a 46-57 month sentance. There was alot of hoopla after he was acquitted on 8 counts of terror related charges last December. I wonder what the media will say now. As part of the plea bargain he will be deported.story
Good Ridance!
Good Ridance!
Dirty Arab
Well it seems that the Moussaoui defense team has given up on the crazy bit and is seeking to play the victim card. I guess he was abused by his dad as a child. He waws in an orphanage, but wait, he was also called a "Dirty Arab." The Horror! Kill Him!
The other argument I keep hearing is that we can't kill him because this is what he wants. Excuse me! If he wants death lets bring it to him. All of these Islamofaciscists want death, don't you get it. We just need to get the stomach to kill them. You know the old saying, be careful what you wish for.
The other argument I keep hearing is that we can't kill him because this is what he wants. Excuse me! If he wants death lets bring it to him. All of these Islamofaciscists want death, don't you get it. We just need to get the stomach to kill them. You know the old saying, be careful what you wish for.
Monday, April 17, 2006
The Gays are coming, the gays are coming
Apparently some gay parents had the nerve to attend the White House Easter Party. story Although I do believe that the gay parents wearing rainbow leighs was political and might have been overdoing it, that speaks more to others uncomfort than it does to them.
I for one do not care about gays. Let them marry, let them celebrate Easter it is no skin off my back. My parents generation has already destroyed marriage so I don't buy any arguements that claim gays will ruin it. Get over it people, gays have been around since forever.
I for one do not care about gays. Let them marry, let them celebrate Easter it is no skin off my back. My parents generation has already destroyed marriage so I don't buy any arguements that claim gays will ruin it. Get over it people, gays have been around since forever.
Hamas
It appears that the new and improved moderate Hamas does not have the political will to be a partner in peace with Israel. I held out hope for awhile hoping that the intoxication of power would allow them to rethink their hardline stance against Israel. Although I believe that the second intifada did increase the Palastinian political power the inability to know when to stop is undermining their cause. I say it increased their bargaining power because the second intifada showed that they have the capacity to strike Israel hard in Israel. A strong enemy has much more leverage than a weak one. This is why our enemies want a nuke so bad, they know that their political power increases as their military might does. If Hamas would clamp down on the other terror groups and restore order to Gaza they would be viewed as legitimate partners. Alas they now seem impotent.
Sunday, April 16, 2006
Fire Rumsfeld 2 Months Ago!
I believe the time may have passed for Bush to fire Rumsfeld without appearing impotent. Bush could have shored up more support and created a new energy for the war by naming a new S.O.D but he chose to wait and do nothing. If he replaces him now he will appear weak and reactionary. But every day that he does not he seems more and more out of touch. Tough position but his own fault.
Saturday, April 15, 2006
Cowardly Central
Check out the response to complaints of the censorship of South Park's "Cartoon Wars." It would be funny if it weren't so sad. They failed to stand up for free speech, yet by reading this one would think they showed the image.
This piece of garbage is a must read
This piece of garbage is a must read
Friday, April 14, 2006
The Jaywalking Grandma
After it became public that an 82 year-old woman has received a $114 jaywalking ticket she has been receiving national attention. People are outraged at the police for doing this to such an old woman. story
To summarize, she began crossing while the red do not cross light was flashing for this she received a ticket.
Excuse me if I don't burst into tears. Maybe I am impatient but I am sick of driving behind old people who think it is alright to go under the speed limit or walk so slow across the street that they impede traffic. They should be ticketed just like anyone esle. If you are to old to drive have someone drive you if you are to old to walk get one of those old people scooters.
To summarize, she began crossing while the red do not cross light was flashing for this she received a ticket.
Excuse me if I don't burst into tears. Maybe I am impatient but I am sick of driving behind old people who think it is alright to go under the speed limit or walk so slow across the street that they impede traffic. They should be ticketed just like anyone esle. If you are to old to drive have someone drive you if you are to old to walk get one of those old people scooters.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Free Speech Gone in South Park
Well whoever saw last nights South Park saw an otherwise excellent South Park ruined by censorship.
Comedy Central refused to allow an image of the prophet Mohhamed ironically they did allow Jesus, President Bush, a random pregnant single mother, and various other random Americans to shit on each other and the U.S flag. I guess it does not matter if they offend their consumer base because we are just a bunch of schmucks who won't do anything about it.
Comedy Central refused to allow an image of the prophet Mohhamed ironically they did allow Jesus, President Bush, a random pregnant single mother, and various other random Americans to shit on each other and the U.S flag. I guess it does not matter if they offend their consumer base because we are just a bunch of schmucks who won't do anything about it.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Democrats & Immigration
Republicans Frist & Hassert issued a joint statement regarding immigration, here is my favorite part:
"In December, the House of Representatives passed a strong border security bill aimed at securing our borders and preventing illegal immigration," the statement said.
"However, on December 16, 2005, there were 191 House Democrats who voted to oppose House Republican efforts to reduce the crime of unlawful presence in the United States from a felony to a misdemeanor. Instead, they voted to make felons out of all of those who remain in our country illegally. (Some conservative Republicans also favored making unlawful presence a felony.)
But I thought the Democrats were for immigrants. It appears that they are trying (somewhat successfully I might add) to exploit this issue and win back some of the Hispanic vote they lost last time.
"In December, the House of Representatives passed a strong border security bill aimed at securing our borders and preventing illegal immigration," the statement said.
"However, on December 16, 2005, there were 191 House Democrats who voted to oppose House Republican efforts to reduce the crime of unlawful presence in the United States from a felony to a misdemeanor. Instead, they voted to make felons out of all of those who remain in our country illegally. (Some conservative Republicans also favored making unlawful presence a felony.)
But I thought the Democrats were for immigrants. It appears that they are trying (somewhat successfully I might add) to exploit this issue and win back some of the Hispanic vote they lost last time.
South Park Tonight!
Will America bury their heads in the sand? Will Comedy Central puss out? Tune in tonight for a can't miss South Park, 10 p.m. est, 7 p.m. pst.
If I had to guess then I would guess that they show it.
If I had to guess then I would guess that they show it.
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
The War is Lost!
Or so say some prominent conservatives such as William F. Buckley and Newt Gingrich, Barnett digs a little deeper in an excellent defense of the war. check it out
Here is a brief quote:
Saying we “lost the war” in Iraq is simply saying “I want a return to the old days of the Powell Doctrine,” which only got us 9/11 and the rising Occidentalism of the Salafis who think American “staying power” is defined by helicopters fleeing over the horizon with their tail rotors between their legs.
The Powell Doctrine was perfect for the old Neocons, because it was a strategy of limited regret, limited impact, limited success and guaranteed long-term reliance on military arms to do nothing more than maintain a declining status quo.
But the Bushies went beyond those limitations on Iraq, which I thought and still think was completely necessary. Yes, it exposed a lot of bad thinking, bad planning, bad force structure, bad doctrine, bad operations, etc. in the U.S. military, but all those exposures have led to necessary change--and change long-delayed at that.
As for the Iraq situation dragging on, it’s so weird that the conservatives can listen to the insurgency experts talk about needing a good decade to defeat such an effort and yet declare, just three years into the intervention, that all is obviously lost. Where these guys’ sense of history is, I do not know.
Wehner points out that “One might hope our own democratic development--which included the Articles of Confederation and a ‘fiery trial’ that cost more than 600,000 American lives--would remind critics that we must sometimes be patient with others.”
Me? I just like to remind everyone of the UN’s own estimate that we killed about 50,000 Iraqis each year for 12 years with our pointless sanctions between Desert Storm and OIF. Makes for a nice round number, doesn’t it.
I would be lying to say that I do not think about the viability of the War constantly. Although there is no clear cut answer, I believe we should have some more patience.
Here is a brief quote:
Saying we “lost the war” in Iraq is simply saying “I want a return to the old days of the Powell Doctrine,” which only got us 9/11 and the rising Occidentalism of the Salafis who think American “staying power” is defined by helicopters fleeing over the horizon with their tail rotors between their legs.
The Powell Doctrine was perfect for the old Neocons, because it was a strategy of limited regret, limited impact, limited success and guaranteed long-term reliance on military arms to do nothing more than maintain a declining status quo.
But the Bushies went beyond those limitations on Iraq, which I thought and still think was completely necessary. Yes, it exposed a lot of bad thinking, bad planning, bad force structure, bad doctrine, bad operations, etc. in the U.S. military, but all those exposures have led to necessary change--and change long-delayed at that.
As for the Iraq situation dragging on, it’s so weird that the conservatives can listen to the insurgency experts talk about needing a good decade to defeat such an effort and yet declare, just three years into the intervention, that all is obviously lost. Where these guys’ sense of history is, I do not know.
Wehner points out that “One might hope our own democratic development--which included the Articles of Confederation and a ‘fiery trial’ that cost more than 600,000 American lives--would remind critics that we must sometimes be patient with others.”
Me? I just like to remind everyone of the UN’s own estimate that we killed about 50,000 Iraqis each year for 12 years with our pointless sanctions between Desert Storm and OIF. Makes for a nice round number, doesn’t it.
I would be lying to say that I do not think about the viability of the War constantly. Although there is no clear cut answer, I believe we should have some more patience.
Amnesty
Recently I said that amensty was in order. I want to clear up exactly what I mean.
First, those claiming that we can easily deport all of the illegal immigrants do not seem to have thought this through. The resources needed to find all of the illegal immigrants alone would be huge. Second, once we find them we will have to send them to some sort of hearing, which I am guessing will also be extremely costly. Next, once these illegals are gone where are we going to find enough workers to replace them fast. I don't want to hear about prisoners either. The incentives for them to do a good job would not be there and many of them would definitely not want to work in the fields. Now have any of these people that want to deport immediatly ever taken a course in ECONOMICS! Hello people it is called supply & demand. You cannnot get rid of these illegals and not expect more to come as long as there is a demand for there labor. Lastly, we need to increase quotas for laborers from Latin America.
As for amnesty, I believe that those who have been here and working for at least two years should get some sort of program where they pay back taxes or a fine and then are given work visas. Once those visas expire then they should be allowed to file for citizenship.
Something like this must be done. Let us not forget that it is our economy which makes us a super power.
First, those claiming that we can easily deport all of the illegal immigrants do not seem to have thought this through. The resources needed to find all of the illegal immigrants alone would be huge. Second, once we find them we will have to send them to some sort of hearing, which I am guessing will also be extremely costly. Next, once these illegals are gone where are we going to find enough workers to replace them fast. I don't want to hear about prisoners either. The incentives for them to do a good job would not be there and many of them would definitely not want to work in the fields. Now have any of these people that want to deport immediatly ever taken a course in ECONOMICS! Hello people it is called supply & demand. You cannnot get rid of these illegals and not expect more to come as long as there is a demand for there labor. Lastly, we need to increase quotas for laborers from Latin America.
As for amnesty, I believe that those who have been here and working for at least two years should get some sort of program where they pay back taxes or a fine and then are given work visas. Once those visas expire then they should be allowed to file for citizenship.
Something like this must be done. Let us not forget that it is our economy which makes us a super power.
Monday, April 10, 2006
America's best ally China?
Those who know me realize that I am a huge fan of Thomas Barnett. This article is a must read. Here is the crux of his argument:
Some history: A century ago, England reigned as the leading military superpower with its global network of colonies and its world-class navy. Meanwhile, America was the upstart power with its booming industrial base and Great White Fleet that it used primarily for threatening - and sometimes conquering - small island nations.
England was smart enough back then to realize that America's rise was unstoppable. So the Brits followed the first rule of ruling the world: Don't fight the inevitable! Instead, Britain took America under its wing, playing Greece to our Rome. The British mentored our rise, knowing that it preordained their decline.
Fast forward: This time around, we're playing the Brits, and the Chinese are playing the Americans.
Far be it from me to argue with Barnett. I for one would welcome the partnership.
Some history: A century ago, England reigned as the leading military superpower with its global network of colonies and its world-class navy. Meanwhile, America was the upstart power with its booming industrial base and Great White Fleet that it used primarily for threatening - and sometimes conquering - small island nations.
England was smart enough back then to realize that America's rise was unstoppable. So the Brits followed the first rule of ruling the world: Don't fight the inevitable! Instead, Britain took America under its wing, playing Greece to our Rome. The British mentored our rise, knowing that it preordained their decline.
Fast forward: This time around, we're playing the Brits, and the Chinese are playing the Americans.
Far be it from me to argue with Barnett. I for one would welcome the partnership.
Borders First!
IMHO, it seems counter productive to have a debate about what we should do with the 12 million illegal immigrants in this country before we secure our borders. The first thing we need to do is stop the flow of illegals, then we can decide what to do with the ones that are here. This is because if we do offer some sort of amnesty deal then millions more would enter the country hoping to fast track themselves to citizenship.
I believe that amensty, however bad a policy it might be, is the best option, BUT ONLY if we secure the borders. It makes no sense to me, to waste resources going after illegal immigrants whom we can only imprison or deport. That would cost millions upon millions and would harm production. If we were able to deport all 12 million overnight, what would happen to the economy? Certainly, losing millions of workers overnight would be catastrophic to economic production. Illegal immigration has been an issue long before 9/11 yet I do not remember so many ivoking security as the main reason to close the border.
To be clear, I think fear mongering is way overdone. First, I believe that some are going way too far by invoking the War on Terror. To be sure, open borders are not good for stopping terrorists that want to attack but lets not go too far.
Likewise, the race card being played by some is tired and old. Sure, its racist to have a border policy. I wonder why these newly oppressed Mexicans do not claim that Mexico is racist for its strict border policy. Better yet why aren't they protesting Vicente Fox's non-existant programs for the poor? No they want to come here to get opportunities that are not available in their country and then they have the nerve to cry racism once we try and regulate our border.
I believe that amensty, however bad a policy it might be, is the best option, BUT ONLY if we secure the borders. It makes no sense to me, to waste resources going after illegal immigrants whom we can only imprison or deport. That would cost millions upon millions and would harm production. If we were able to deport all 12 million overnight, what would happen to the economy? Certainly, losing millions of workers overnight would be catastrophic to economic production. Illegal immigration has been an issue long before 9/11 yet I do not remember so many ivoking security as the main reason to close the border.
To be clear, I think fear mongering is way overdone. First, I believe that some are going way too far by invoking the War on Terror. To be sure, open borders are not good for stopping terrorists that want to attack but lets not go too far.
Likewise, the race card being played by some is tired and old. Sure, its racist to have a border policy. I wonder why these newly oppressed Mexicans do not claim that Mexico is racist for its strict border policy. Better yet why aren't they protesting Vicente Fox's non-existant programs for the poor? No they want to come here to get opportunities that are not available in their country and then they have the nerve to cry racism once we try and regulate our border.
Didn't we see this coming
It's official, the immigration protesters have officially become tools of the left. This is my worst fear! The left has used Mexicans protesting the new immigration bill to promote their crappy agenda. Michelle Malkin has pictures up of Mexicans marching with a banner for A.C.C.E.S.S or Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services. Likewise, Dawud Walid, 34, of Detroit, executive director of Council on American-Islamic Relations-Michigan, attended the Detroit rally. True that Mexicans are not the only illegal immigrant group but do Mexicans really want to get in bed with fringe groups. (other attendees include A.N.S.W.E.R., and the Black Panthers, to be fair I actually like the old Black Panther movement). pictures
As an American of Mexican descent, I fear that this sudden spark of political activism by the Hispanic community will end with the Hispanic community becoming tools of the left, much like the African-American movement. I can already see the crappy leaders that worship from the goblet of racism. Any Hispanic that denies that we are a completely oppressed race will then lose their ethnicity.
As an American of Mexican descent, I fear that this sudden spark of political activism by the Hispanic community will end with the Hispanic community becoming tools of the left, much like the African-American movement. I can already see the crappy leaders that worship from the goblet of racism. Any Hispanic that denies that we are a completely oppressed race will then lose their ethnicity.
Iran
The Bush administration is ratcheting up plans to strike Iran's nuclear facilities according to Seymour M. Hersh
Personally, I believe that Bush should not be the President to take out their nuclear facilities. Although, estimations are all over the board, I believe that Iran is at least 3 years away from making a nuke. Bush should leave this to the next President who must do this attack with broad international support. We need to learn from Iraq. It is extremely difficult to nation build with many countries constantly undermining the effort.
Personally, I believe that Bush should not be the President to take out their nuclear facilities. Although, estimations are all over the board, I believe that Iran is at least 3 years away from making a nuke. Bush should leave this to the next President who must do this attack with broad international support. We need to learn from Iraq. It is extremely difficult to nation build with many countries constantly undermining the effort.
Their Here!
China's new line of cars is about to be intoduced. The first car should be ready this year with an expected production of 600,000 cars a year by 2010. story
As if Ford and Chevy needed anymore bad news.
As if Ford and Chevy needed anymore bad news.
Stick a fork in em!
Their done! France has repealed the controversial law that would have allowed employers to fire workers under 26 years of age without cause. Wow!
I see no way that France can continue to compete in a global market with their backwards view on work. How can an employer run a business if he or she can not fire anyone?
I see no way that France can continue to compete in a global market with their backwards view on work. How can an employer run a business if he or she can not fire anyone?
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Judas a Hero?
Apparently there is a newly translated gospel of Judas. Story
I for one am fascinated with the topic and I would love to read the manuscript. There are many gospels that are not included in the bible. To me, the inclusion and exclusion of gospels in the new testament was highly political and it lead me to not only question my faith and my beliefs but ultimately change them.
National Geographic is doing a special on the Gospel of Judas, Sunday, April 9, 10 p.m. EST
Don't miss it!
I for one am fascinated with the topic and I would love to read the manuscript. There are many gospels that are not included in the bible. To me, the inclusion and exclusion of gospels in the new testament was highly political and it lead me to not only question my faith and my beliefs but ultimately change them.
National Geographic is doing a special on the Gospel of Judas, Sunday, April 9, 10 p.m. EST
Don't miss it!
South Park & Muhamed
You have to watch this weeks epsiode of Sout Park, it is funny and important. They are trying to get Comdey Central to allow them to have "The Prophet Muhamed" in an episode but the powers that be do not want them doing it. They created this show to parody their fight with the TV suits. Comedy Central allows them to degrade Christianity, Judasim, Mormons, Mexicans, Blacks, Scientologists, etc...yet they will not allow them to make fun of Islam? Can you say hypocrit? More later...
Monday, April 03, 2006
Something Cool
Wednessday at precisely three seconds and two minutes after 1 a.m. The time will be 01:02:03 04/05/06, that won't happen for another hundred years. Well, I think its cool. (Hat tip Andrew Sullivan)
Paul & Jesus
I consider Paul one of the most influential people in Western Culture. I believe that Christianity is the religion of Paul and not Jesus. Imagine if Paul would have gone east into Asia instead of West. Rome most certainly would have never become Christian; perhaps the East would be Christians and the West Muslims? Perhaps not, anyway on to Paul.
Paul traveled around not to spread the teachings of Jesus, but to transform Christ into a god. I believe that he alludes to that in Galatians. “Now I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel preached by me is not of human origin. For I did not receive it from a human being…but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.” (Galatians 2, 11-12). Revelations of Christ after his death, to me, this speaks volumes. Jesus never claimed to be a god nor did he desire to create some universal religion, he wanted Judaism to reclaim its morals. Not so with Paul, he was intent on creation of a new order.
Paul said that the laws were in place because of the excessive depravity from humans. Paul said that with the coming of Christ the need for laws to obtain salvation or to be righteous is no more, all that one needs now is faith. Before the coming of Christ, the Hebrews relied on adherence to the laws to gain access to the promise land. Faith in Paul’s teachings not in the teaching of Christ.
Even though Paul claimed to be spreading the teachings of Jesus there are some differences in the message they deliver to the people. Paul was forcefully telling people that the laws no longer applied, “…because by works of the law no one will be justified,” (Galatians 2, 16). Paul was upset because the pagans he converted to Christ had begun to observe Jewish law after enticement from other missionaries (Galatians, Intro). Paul constantly reminded new converts that faith, not laws was the ticket into heaven. Paul said that faith replaced law because this was Gods will. This message was vastly different because Jesus did not tell people that the laws were no longer relevant in such absolute terms.
“…I say to you until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law…” (Galatians, 5, 18). As Jesus preached the Sermon on the Mount, he focuses on obeying the spirit of the law, not the abolition of the law. Jesus told his followers that it would be harder to get to heaven following his words because God will judge people by what is in their heart not just by their actions. Not once did Jesus claim that faith in him would lead to salvation.
No matter, because I have lost this argument I believe that most would consider this a ridiculous position. Unfortunately, once the split from Judaism occured they manipulated scriptures and used Christian law (such as only clergy can interpret scriptures) to maintain their power of society. It appears that Paul is the catalyst behind this change. The only logical step after this would be for Martin Luther to discredit Catholic laws, which of course he did. It appears that you cannot rescue religion from human corruption.
Paul traveled around not to spread the teachings of Jesus, but to transform Christ into a god. I believe that he alludes to that in Galatians. “Now I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel preached by me is not of human origin. For I did not receive it from a human being…but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.” (Galatians 2, 11-12). Revelations of Christ after his death, to me, this speaks volumes. Jesus never claimed to be a god nor did he desire to create some universal religion, he wanted Judaism to reclaim its morals. Not so with Paul, he was intent on creation of a new order.
Paul said that the laws were in place because of the excessive depravity from humans. Paul said that with the coming of Christ the need for laws to obtain salvation or to be righteous is no more, all that one needs now is faith. Before the coming of Christ, the Hebrews relied on adherence to the laws to gain access to the promise land. Faith in Paul’s teachings not in the teaching of Christ.
Even though Paul claimed to be spreading the teachings of Jesus there are some differences in the message they deliver to the people. Paul was forcefully telling people that the laws no longer applied, “…because by works of the law no one will be justified,” (Galatians 2, 16). Paul was upset because the pagans he converted to Christ had begun to observe Jewish law after enticement from other missionaries (Galatians, Intro). Paul constantly reminded new converts that faith, not laws was the ticket into heaven. Paul said that faith replaced law because this was Gods will. This message was vastly different because Jesus did not tell people that the laws were no longer relevant in such absolute terms.
“…I say to you until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law…” (Galatians, 5, 18). As Jesus preached the Sermon on the Mount, he focuses on obeying the spirit of the law, not the abolition of the law. Jesus told his followers that it would be harder to get to heaven following his words because God will judge people by what is in their heart not just by their actions. Not once did Jesus claim that faith in him would lead to salvation.
No matter, because I have lost this argument I believe that most would consider this a ridiculous position. Unfortunately, once the split from Judaism occured they manipulated scriptures and used Christian law (such as only clergy can interpret scriptures) to maintain their power of society. It appears that Paul is the catalyst behind this change. The only logical step after this would be for Martin Luther to discredit Catholic laws, which of course he did. It appears that you cannot rescue religion from human corruption.
Friday, March 31, 2006
Immigration
I think if we are going to have an honest debate about immigration than both sides have to admit to their overstatements.
First, unskilled illegal immigrants drive down wages for the labor jobs. The unskilled illegal immigrants taxes do not cover the costs of services provided such as education and healthcare. Likewise they are taking jobs that Americans want, for example according to Newsweek illegal immigrants make up, 29% of all roofers and agricultural workers, 25% of all brick masons and construction laborers,20% of all computer hardware engineers, 18% of upholsterers. The point is Americans are already doing these jobs! These are all professions that Americans have always worked in, the difference is Americans don't want to work for peanuts.
But...
We need immigrants to keep our economy growing. The current birthrate demands that we import workers into this country to meet labor demands. Also, it is not good policy to make illegal immigrants felons. If we arrested the 12 million illegals the court costs (translators for all)and incarceration costs would bankrupt the country, not to mention the blow the economy would take from the significant loss of a labor force.
There is also another improtant factor to consider and that is culture and identity. Many fear that Mexican immigrants will not assimilate. I think this is happens because people know that Mexicans have been coming to this country since the US first won it from Mexico in war. It appears as if Mexicans are not upward mobile and prefer to stay segregated off with their own people. This is not so true. Third and second generation descendents of Mexican immigrants (I am a third generation)usually do not speak Spanish and are American. Unlike other immigrant groups, such as the Irish or Italians or whomever, the Mexican immigrants keep coming. This means that Mexicans are always in low employment positions. It makes it appear that Mexicans as a whole have not imroved their lot and that is not true. The descendents of the Mexican immigrants from the 1920 wave of Mexican immigration have assimilated and prospered. That being said it is a different time. My grandparents refused to allow their children to speak Spanish because they were Americans, you don't see that too much anymore.
The bottom line is we must take control over our borders. It is illogical to claim we cannot regulate and control our borders because the country was founded on immigration. But we need to do it in a sensible way that allows for economic growth.
First, unskilled illegal immigrants drive down wages for the labor jobs. The unskilled illegal immigrants taxes do not cover the costs of services provided such as education and healthcare. Likewise they are taking jobs that Americans want, for example according to Newsweek illegal immigrants make up, 29% of all roofers and agricultural workers, 25% of all brick masons and construction laborers,20% of all computer hardware engineers, 18% of upholsterers. The point is Americans are already doing these jobs! These are all professions that Americans have always worked in, the difference is Americans don't want to work for peanuts.
But...
We need immigrants to keep our economy growing. The current birthrate demands that we import workers into this country to meet labor demands. Also, it is not good policy to make illegal immigrants felons. If we arrested the 12 million illegals the court costs (translators for all)and incarceration costs would bankrupt the country, not to mention the blow the economy would take from the significant loss of a labor force.
There is also another improtant factor to consider and that is culture and identity. Many fear that Mexican immigrants will not assimilate. I think this is happens because people know that Mexicans have been coming to this country since the US first won it from Mexico in war. It appears as if Mexicans are not upward mobile and prefer to stay segregated off with their own people. This is not so true. Third and second generation descendents of Mexican immigrants (I am a third generation)usually do not speak Spanish and are American. Unlike other immigrant groups, such as the Irish or Italians or whomever, the Mexican immigrants keep coming. This means that Mexicans are always in low employment positions. It makes it appear that Mexicans as a whole have not imroved their lot and that is not true. The descendents of the Mexican immigrants from the 1920 wave of Mexican immigration have assimilated and prospered. That being said it is a different time. My grandparents refused to allow their children to speak Spanish because they were Americans, you don't see that too much anymore.
The bottom line is we must take control over our borders. It is illogical to claim we cannot regulate and control our borders because the country was founded on immigration. But we need to do it in a sensible way that allows for economic growth.
New Template
The black was becoming a little tiring for my eyes. I decided to try a light background and see if that helps. Any comments are welcomed.
Jesus & the Jewish Laws
Although I am not religious, I was raised catholic and I enjoy reading the bible. I read it much like other philosophy books. So here is my interpretation of Jesus and Jewish Laws.
The Old Testament explains God’s covenant with Abraham and his special relationship with the Hebrew people highlighted in his dealings with Moses. Next the Torah laid out specific laws that the Hebrew people needed to follow in order to maintain their relationship with God. That became the status quo for hundreds of years, but that all changed with the birth of Jesus. Jesus believed that the Hebrew relationship with God was compromised by the continuation of the ancient laws. He believed that the Pharisees had perverted the purpose of the laws thereby negating the need for those laws.
The social meaning of law is to preserve society, it does that by reinforcing values or traditions that the society holds high. The number one goal of every society is self-preservation, society’s meet this goal be turning customs and traditions into law. The ancient Hebrew gained their identity from the laws and legitimized their right to Jerusalem through the laws of God. Eventually those laws used to strengthen their identity and their relationship with God began to weaken their spirituality.
“For if the inheritance comes from the law, it is no longer from a promise; but god bestowed it on Abraham through a promise,” (The New American Bible, Galatians 3, 18). Certainly, laws cannot determine whom God allows into heaven and whom God sends to hell. God promised Abraham eternal salvation but the Pharisees began to use the laws as a control mechanism. They used the laws to acquire more power and began to corrupt the laws. This is why Paul felt that it was necessary to defy the Pharisees and compel people to disregard the laws because the coming of Jesus nullified those laws and enabled everyone to become a child of Abraham. Paul claims that Jesus came down to accept the burden that humanity had been shouldering until that point in time.
The problem is that over time the Hebrew laws began to lose meaning. This happens because people subconsciously follow laws with out putting much thought into why they are obeying this particular law. Jesus displayed the problems with passively following laws. People begin to follow the letter of the law and not the spirit of the law. Jesus believed that people should follow the laws in their heart. Jesus did not believe that simply performing a specific action such as circumcision makes one righteous. “You disregard God’s commandment but cling to human tradition,” (New American Bible Mark 7, 8).
This led to a certain amount of confusion because the Hebrews thought that Jesus abolished those laws. For example, the Hebrew would consider a person that never murders and never commits adultery as righteous. Jesus said that if that person has hate constantly in is heart and lust always in his mind than he is not righteous and it does not matter that he does not act on these feelings. The mere presence of negative thoughts means the person has violated the spirit of the law. Jesus tells his followers “…it was said to your ancestors, you shall not kill…but I say to you whoever is angry with his brother is liable to judgment,” (New American Bible Matthew 5, 21-22).
The laws also contributed to the Hebrew identity. By abolishing these laws, Jesus transformed the religion from one of a cultural and region specific religion to that of a universal religion. “Realize then that it is those who have faith who are children of Abraham,” (New American Bible, Galatians 3, 7). This means that salvation is no loner for a particular people but rather for all who believe. This is extremely important because until this point, the Hebrew's were the chosen people of God and only descendents could obtain entrance into heaven.
In my opinion Jesus is not the son of an almighty super natural being but rather a philosopher and preacher of peace and justice. I do not, as some do, begrudge others or smite them for interpreting it different.
The Old Testament explains God’s covenant with Abraham and his special relationship with the Hebrew people highlighted in his dealings with Moses. Next the Torah laid out specific laws that the Hebrew people needed to follow in order to maintain their relationship with God. That became the status quo for hundreds of years, but that all changed with the birth of Jesus. Jesus believed that the Hebrew relationship with God was compromised by the continuation of the ancient laws. He believed that the Pharisees had perverted the purpose of the laws thereby negating the need for those laws.
The social meaning of law is to preserve society, it does that by reinforcing values or traditions that the society holds high. The number one goal of every society is self-preservation, society’s meet this goal be turning customs and traditions into law. The ancient Hebrew gained their identity from the laws and legitimized their right to Jerusalem through the laws of God. Eventually those laws used to strengthen their identity and their relationship with God began to weaken their spirituality.
“For if the inheritance comes from the law, it is no longer from a promise; but god bestowed it on Abraham through a promise,” (The New American Bible, Galatians 3, 18). Certainly, laws cannot determine whom God allows into heaven and whom God sends to hell. God promised Abraham eternal salvation but the Pharisees began to use the laws as a control mechanism. They used the laws to acquire more power and began to corrupt the laws. This is why Paul felt that it was necessary to defy the Pharisees and compel people to disregard the laws because the coming of Jesus nullified those laws and enabled everyone to become a child of Abraham. Paul claims that Jesus came down to accept the burden that humanity had been shouldering until that point in time.
The problem is that over time the Hebrew laws began to lose meaning. This happens because people subconsciously follow laws with out putting much thought into why they are obeying this particular law. Jesus displayed the problems with passively following laws. People begin to follow the letter of the law and not the spirit of the law. Jesus believed that people should follow the laws in their heart. Jesus did not believe that simply performing a specific action such as circumcision makes one righteous. “You disregard God’s commandment but cling to human tradition,” (New American Bible Mark 7, 8).
This led to a certain amount of confusion because the Hebrews thought that Jesus abolished those laws. For example, the Hebrew would consider a person that never murders and never commits adultery as righteous. Jesus said that if that person has hate constantly in is heart and lust always in his mind than he is not righteous and it does not matter that he does not act on these feelings. The mere presence of negative thoughts means the person has violated the spirit of the law. Jesus tells his followers “…it was said to your ancestors, you shall not kill…but I say to you whoever is angry with his brother is liable to judgment,” (New American Bible Matthew 5, 21-22).
The laws also contributed to the Hebrew identity. By abolishing these laws, Jesus transformed the religion from one of a cultural and region specific religion to that of a universal religion. “Realize then that it is those who have faith who are children of Abraham,” (New American Bible, Galatians 3, 7). This means that salvation is no loner for a particular people but rather for all who believe. This is extremely important because until this point, the Hebrew's were the chosen people of God and only descendents could obtain entrance into heaven.
In my opinion Jesus is not the son of an almighty super natural being but rather a philosopher and preacher of peace and justice. I do not, as some do, begrudge others or smite them for interpreting it different.
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
The French
Is it any wonder that the French are irrelevant? There are estimates that more than 1 million protestors took to the streets today. They are protesting a new law which would allow employers to fire workers under 26 if they have been there less than 2 years. complete story
These quotes sum up the mindset of the French.
"We're demanding the complete withdrawal of the CPE. You can't treat people like slaves. Giving all the power to the bosses is going too far," said Gregoire de Oliviera, a 21-year-old student protesting in Paris.
The problem is we are studying just to be exploited. The government must withdraw the CPE. We will continue to protest on the streets," said Laura Dali, an 18-year-old student in Paris.
It seems obvious that France can only lose political, economic and military power in the future. People should not have a right to a job just as an employer should not have a right to my labor.
These quotes sum up the mindset of the French.
"We're demanding the complete withdrawal of the CPE. You can't treat people like slaves. Giving all the power to the bosses is going too far," said Gregoire de Oliviera, a 21-year-old student protesting in Paris.
The problem is we are studying just to be exploited. The government must withdraw the CPE. We will continue to protest on the streets," said Laura Dali, an 18-year-old student in Paris.
It seems obvious that France can only lose political, economic and military power in the future. People should not have a right to a job just as an employer should not have a right to my labor.
Friday, March 24, 2006
Blogs VS Old Media
As a journalism major I constantly hear about the horrors of blogging via my professors. Their rational is bloggers are not journalists, they are biased and they play fast and loose with the facts. Recently, accomplished journalist Dan Thomasson visited my media ethics class. When I asked him what he thought about blogs he was not positive. He characterized this rise of new media as "a very disturbing period of time."
This is a close-minded view of blogs. Blogs are the equivalent of the op-ed page; the difference is that the audience can usually respond to the story and other’s readers responses to the story. Any intelligent person can tell if a person has thought out a response to a complex issue or is just regurgitating partisan talking points. Any hint of poorly thought out opinion will be ridiculed and attacked. I think that the fact that the readers know a bloggers political leaning prior to reading makes it more ethical. Traditional media claims to be objective while blogs are honest about their bias.
To be sure, there are partisan blogs that reset talking points but only partisan people who do not want objectivity would limit themselves to those blogs. Blogs acknowledge that readers do not want passive participation but rather they desire to have their voice heard as well. Traditional media outlets choose to insulate themselves from their audience reserving their participation to a few “letters to the editor” that will be printed. While news editors continue their role as gate keeper; blogs invite the masses to join the discussion through a much bigger gate.
This is a close-minded view of blogs. Blogs are the equivalent of the op-ed page; the difference is that the audience can usually respond to the story and other’s readers responses to the story. Any intelligent person can tell if a person has thought out a response to a complex issue or is just regurgitating partisan talking points. Any hint of poorly thought out opinion will be ridiculed and attacked. I think that the fact that the readers know a bloggers political leaning prior to reading makes it more ethical. Traditional media claims to be objective while blogs are honest about their bias.
To be sure, there are partisan blogs that reset talking points but only partisan people who do not want objectivity would limit themselves to those blogs. Blogs acknowledge that readers do not want passive participation but rather they desire to have their voice heard as well. Traditional media outlets choose to insulate themselves from their audience reserving their participation to a few “letters to the editor” that will be printed. While news editors continue their role as gate keeper; blogs invite the masses to join the discussion through a much bigger gate.
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Fatherhood
Mens rights activists have just sued to have the right to decline fatherhood. complete story
It is about time! Roe v Wade has granted women complete dominion over the family. Women's groups believe that just informing the father of a child of an abortion is an undue burden. "Reproductive rights" are only rights for women. Any attempts by men to assert some rights are viewed as archaic and as a return to the days of oppression. So it is the woman's choice to keep or abort the baby but once the woman decides then the man must adjust to her decision. If she keeps the baby then he must pay child support for eighteen years, if she aborts then tough luck maybe next time.
The act of childbirth, while physically trying is the easy part of parenting. It is the sacrifices and the financial obligations, which last at least eighteen years that are the hard part. Nobody tells their children dont have kids young because it will hurt. They discuss the difficulties of raising the child.
If a man is willing to assume all obligations of child rearing then he should have that right. If that is too much to ask then fatherhood is meaningless.
It is about time! Roe v Wade has granted women complete dominion over the family. Women's groups believe that just informing the father of a child of an abortion is an undue burden. "Reproductive rights" are only rights for women. Any attempts by men to assert some rights are viewed as archaic and as a return to the days of oppression. So it is the woman's choice to keep or abort the baby but once the woman decides then the man must adjust to her decision. If she keeps the baby then he must pay child support for eighteen years, if she aborts then tough luck maybe next time.
The act of childbirth, while physically trying is the easy part of parenting. It is the sacrifices and the financial obligations, which last at least eighteen years that are the hard part. Nobody tells their children dont have kids young because it will hurt. They discuss the difficulties of raising the child.
If a man is willing to assume all obligations of child rearing then he should have that right. If that is too much to ask then fatherhood is meaningless.
Thursday, March 02, 2006
India
Pres. Bush agreed to give nuclear technology to India if they opened their civilian nuclear facilities for inspections.story
Of course there are some in congress who are dead set against this and believe it will provide incentives for other countries to develop nuclear weapons. Certainly, that is possible. But I think it is positive and India should be embraced as an ally.
Of course there are some in congress who are dead set against this and believe it will provide incentives for other countries to develop nuclear weapons. Certainly, that is possible. But I think it is positive and India should be embraced as an ally.
NFLPA
"I won't come down," said Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFL Players Association, who is asking for 60 percent of league revenue for players, four percentage points more than the owners are offering. "The players know that. Only the owners can make a proposal."
complete story
It is time fot the owners to break the NFL union. Usually I am on the side of the players but 60% is outrageous, the owners should lock them out. They do not deserve 60% and Gene Upshaw needs to be fired by the players.
complete story
It is time fot the owners to break the NFL union. Usually I am on the side of the players but 60% is outrageous, the owners should lock them out. They do not deserve 60% and Gene Upshaw needs to be fired by the players.
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
NFLPA & the CBA
As a die-hard NFL fan, the failure to extend the CBA is frightening for me. Apparently, there are two sticking points. First the players union wants to have 60% of the gross total revenue while the owners want to give them 56.2% (something like that). If no deal is reached by friday then this year teams will need to cut big named and big money players. After this year there will be no salary cap. That would be horrible. I do not want to see the NFL turn into MLB. I think the owners should threaten the union with a lock-out if they dont agree. With out a cap most team would not be able to compete and that would be bad for business.
The second point is over revenue sharing, some teams want to expand the sharing to include local revenue in addition to TV contracts and merchandise. Not sure how I feel on this. The Raiders dont make much local money but we sell more merchandise than any team in the league.
The second point is over revenue sharing, some teams want to expand the sharing to include local revenue in addition to TV contracts and merchandise. Not sure how I feel on this. The Raiders dont make much local money but we sell more merchandise than any team in the league.
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Monday, February 27, 2006
High School Exit Exam
In order to graduate high school, students in California need to pass an exam proving that they are ready to graduate. Students who do not speak English are claiming the test is biased. story
Apparently there are about 40,000 students that do not speack much english that have yet to pass. They believe that this test is unnecessary and punitive.
Here is a quote from the student they profiled:
"I need a diploma," said Iris, a chestnut-haired girl who was born in Los Angeles and grew up in the Mexican state of Jalisco. "I want it. I deserve it. I've been going to school and studying. I want to have a profession."
And this one:
"My heart just breaks, because many of these students have been in this country just six months or a year," Martinez-McCoffey said later, her eyes welling with tears.
If you have only been in this country six months to a year than you probably should have waited to finish school if that was not possible then you must find another way. A high school diploma is not a right but a privilage that must be earned. Truthfully, I dropped out to take the GED. But here is a plan for any that cannot pass the test. Simply enroll in community college by the time you finish the required curriculum for the school your high school credits will be earned. What good is a diploma if you dont speak English?
Apparently there are about 40,000 students that do not speack much english that have yet to pass. They believe that this test is unnecessary and punitive.
Here is a quote from the student they profiled:
"I need a diploma," said Iris, a chestnut-haired girl who was born in Los Angeles and grew up in the Mexican state of Jalisco. "I want it. I deserve it. I've been going to school and studying. I want to have a profession."
And this one:
"My heart just breaks, because many of these students have been in this country just six months or a year," Martinez-McCoffey said later, her eyes welling with tears.
If you have only been in this country six months to a year than you probably should have waited to finish school if that was not possible then you must find another way. A high school diploma is not a right but a privilage that must be earned. Truthfully, I dropped out to take the GED. But here is a plan for any that cannot pass the test. Simply enroll in community college by the time you finish the required curriculum for the school your high school credits will be earned. What good is a diploma if you dont speak English?
Friday, February 24, 2006
First it was Irving...
Now a 61 year-old man from Germany has been convicted for insulting Islam. story
Although these cases are in Europe the threat is real here as well. There is no doubt that many would like to see racism or hate speech a convictable offense in this country as well.
Although these cases are in Europe the threat is real here as well. There is no doubt that many would like to see racism or hate speech a convictable offense in this country as well.
Black History Month
Am I the only one that finds Black History Month offensive?
Perhaps there was a time when it was needed. But blacks should see it as a slap in the face. All black history and any other different racial history should be incorporated into American history and be taught at the appropriate time slot. For example, when teaching the 19th century throw in Fredrick Douglass, etc...
Perhaps there was a time when it was needed. But blacks should see it as a slap in the face. All black history and any other different racial history should be incorporated into American history and be taught at the appropriate time slot. For example, when teaching the 19th century throw in Fredrick Douglass, etc...
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Civil War
It seems as though the Sunni's and the Shia's might just get it on after this Mosque attack. story
The angle that I am concerned with is how will this effect Middle Eastern politics? Certainly, the Sunni dominated region must really be aprehensive to Shia Iran acquiring a bomb. I wonder if the Sunni countries will push the U.S or Europe to strike their nuclear facilities sooner rather than later?
Also, what does that mean for the US military if a civil war breaks out?
The angle that I am concerned with is how will this effect Middle Eastern politics? Certainly, the Sunni dominated region must really be aprehensive to Shia Iran acquiring a bomb. I wonder if the Sunni countries will push the U.S or Europe to strike their nuclear facilities sooner rather than later?
Also, what does that mean for the US military if a civil war breaks out?
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Monday, February 20, 2006
Keep Your Laws Off My Body
A 31 year-old Illinios woman wants doctors to circumcise her 8 year-old son against the objections of his father. story
This is outrageous! Girls are allowed complete control over not only their body but seperate bodies growing inside of them and boys are not even allowed dominion over their penis? This makes no sense to me. First, why does this woman want to have her 8 year-old son circumiced? This sounds border line sexual to me.
I think that all arguments over the health ocncerns are void in this country. Perhaps in Africa where AIDS is everywhere and the foreskin does help spread the disease it is necessary, but in this country it is only for cosmetic purposes. There has been no recent studies pointing to a need for circumcision. If a boy wants part of his penis snipped it should be for him and him alone to decide (when he is an adult).It is dehumanizing to allow mothers or fathers dominion over their childs penis.
I realize the Jewish religion has ceremonial traditions that demand that babies get this done, but I think it should be illegal for parents to force this on their children. Certainly the covenant would mean more if it was undertaken by an adult fully aware of this implications of this decision than a child who has no idea of what is happening. Religous ceremonies should not be legally protected when they give away a humans rights. Nobody in this country believes for a second that Muslims should be able to cut off the clitoris, why is the foreskin any different?
Certainly, parents should not have complete control to force cosmetic surgery on their children. A just society would allow boys control over their own penis, would it not?
This is outrageous! Girls are allowed complete control over not only their body but seperate bodies growing inside of them and boys are not even allowed dominion over their penis? This makes no sense to me. First, why does this woman want to have her 8 year-old son circumiced? This sounds border line sexual to me.
I think that all arguments over the health ocncerns are void in this country. Perhaps in Africa where AIDS is everywhere and the foreskin does help spread the disease it is necessary, but in this country it is only for cosmetic purposes. There has been no recent studies pointing to a need for circumcision. If a boy wants part of his penis snipped it should be for him and him alone to decide (when he is an adult).It is dehumanizing to allow mothers or fathers dominion over their childs penis.
I realize the Jewish religion has ceremonial traditions that demand that babies get this done, but I think it should be illegal for parents to force this on their children. Certainly the covenant would mean more if it was undertaken by an adult fully aware of this implications of this decision than a child who has no idea of what is happening. Religous ceremonies should not be legally protected when they give away a humans rights. Nobody in this country believes for a second that Muslims should be able to cut off the clitoris, why is the foreskin any different?
Certainly, parents should not have complete control to force cosmetic surgery on their children. A just society would allow boys control over their own penis, would it not?
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Dick Cheney
I do not get all of the hysteria about Cheney taking a day to notify the press. Of course the press corps and many others are going nuts, Andrew Sullivan writes: "...You are not a monarch; and you are not a Pope. You have seriously wounded another human being. The news was kept from the public for a day. The man is in intensive care. There are many serious questions about the incident: How did it happen? What happened immediately thereafter? Why the decision to keep it secret for so long?..."
Maybe Cheney did not want the hospital to become a circus, which it would have.
It seems that there are many issues that are more important to be spending so much time on this. I really dont care that he shot someone on accident. Maybe the press should focus this much attention to Iraq, the Sudan, etc...
Maybe Cheney did not want the hospital to become a circus, which it would have.
It seems that there are many issues that are more important to be spending so much time on this. I really dont care that he shot someone on accident. Maybe the press should focus this much attention to Iraq, the Sudan, etc...
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Batman
Batman writer FRANK MILLER tells the New York Post, "It is, not to put too fine a point on it, a piece of propaganda. Batman kicks al-Qaeda's ass."
It is nice to finally see some Americans comic book heroes getting into the propaganda. Long over due!
It is nice to finally see some Americans comic book heroes getting into the propaganda. Long over due!
Monday, February 13, 2006
Spelling Bee update
Well the parents succesfully scared the school district into submission. The school will now be sending the three finalists to the state spelling bee. story
"In this case, we found it really unfortunate that the parents of this child did not follow the rules. I don't believe they had a leg to stand on, but we're trying to do what's right. We did not want this to affect the other students in the spelling bee."School official
"I spent a really long time studying for all of this," Sara said Wednesday. "If I would have gone down by misspelling the word, I would have been fine with it. Someone would have been a better speller than me. But I didn't get that word wrong and it is really not fair that I got sent down because I would have really like the chance to go to state."
I hate to sound unsypmathetic but this girl is going to have to learn that life is not fair. I think her parents missed an excellent opportunity to parent and instill some character in her. It seems to me that they missed the boat and actually could have set a bad example for her. It has been my experience that life will always try to knock you down. There will not always be mommy and daddy around to hire a lawyer and threaten law suits.
Perhaps, I am overreacting after all she did spell the word right and I do not even have children, then again maybe I am not.
"In this case, we found it really unfortunate that the parents of this child did not follow the rules. I don't believe they had a leg to stand on, but we're trying to do what's right. We did not want this to affect the other students in the spelling bee."School official
"I spent a really long time studying for all of this," Sara said Wednesday. "If I would have gone down by misspelling the word, I would have been fine with it. Someone would have been a better speller than me. But I didn't get that word wrong and it is really not fair that I got sent down because I would have really like the chance to go to state."
I hate to sound unsypmathetic but this girl is going to have to learn that life is not fair. I think her parents missed an excellent opportunity to parent and instill some character in her. It seems to me that they missed the boat and actually could have set a bad example for her. It has been my experience that life will always try to knock you down. There will not always be mommy and daddy around to hire a lawyer and threaten law suits.
Perhaps, I am overreacting after all she did spell the word right and I do not even have children, then again maybe I am not.
Friday, February 10, 2006
Hope is on the way!
It seems that the us conservatives who believe that the "war on marijuana" is foolish are no longer in the minority, well at least we have allies. story
I for one think it is a huge waist of resources. As long as people are able to go out and drink shots of Tequila and whiskey people should be able to smoke a joint.
I for one think it is a huge waist of resources. As long as people are able to go out and drink shots of Tequila and whiskey people should be able to smoke a joint.
Thursday, February 09, 2006
Great Example
Parents of an 8th grade girl in Reno, are threatening to sue the school district because their child was mistakenly kicked out of the spelling bee. I guess she spelled the word right and the judges got it wrong. Now the parents lawyer is threatening legal action unless the school bord does the last round over. story
What a great example the parents are setting. Is it any wonder that people in this country think that everyone owes them something?
What a great example the parents are setting. Is it any wonder that people in this country think that everyone owes them something?
Made in China
The NYT has an excellent article discussing the growing trade deficit with China. The gist is that most stuff is only assembled in China not made there so the large deficit numbers are misleading.
Here is a telling statistic quoted from the article.
"In fact about 60 percent of this countries (China) exports are controlled by foreign companies according to Chinese customs data."
The author goes on to say that the Chinese workers average about .75 an hour. While that is certainly low and should continue to be raised that is much higher than I believed it was.
Anyway it is an extremely interesting article and I encourage everyone to read it. complete story
note: you need a subsription to read the NYT on-line, however it is free
Here is a telling statistic quoted from the article.
"In fact about 60 percent of this countries (China) exports are controlled by foreign companies according to Chinese customs data."
The author goes on to say that the Chinese workers average about .75 an hour. While that is certainly low and should continue to be raised that is much higher than I believed it was.
Anyway it is an extremely interesting article and I encourage everyone to read it. complete story
note: you need a subsription to read the NYT on-line, however it is free
The hypocrisy of Gambling
For anyone that does not know, Wayne Gretzky and other NHL officials and players have been caught running a gambling ring. story
According to the reports the players did not bet on NHL only other sports. I don't care! furthermore it is disturbing to me that people can be arrested for gambling. It is 2006, shouldn't adults be able to decide if they want to risk their money?
I am a die-hard sports fan and I would never want the integrity of the game questioned, but players betting on other sports does not bother me.
According to the reports the players did not bet on NHL only other sports. I don't care! furthermore it is disturbing to me that people can be arrested for gambling. It is 2006, shouldn't adults be able to decide if they want to risk their money?
I am a die-hard sports fan and I would never want the integrity of the game questioned, but players betting on other sports does not bother me.
Joe Montana
Let be start by saying of all the players I hate in the NFL, there are two above all that I hate Joe Montana and Jerry Rice, with Tom Brady quickly rising on the list.
That being said I think he is taking too much flack for missing the Super Bowl pre-game show. The NFL invioted all of the former SB MVP's and reportedly Joe did not show because he wanted 100K. Everyone has been saying it was bush league for him to do that, or that the NFL gave him everything he should give back, etc...
Joe made himself, the NFL is a for profit business so excuse me if I dont begrudge someone trying to make a profit. Maybe he does not want to be involved with the NFL, that is his choice. He is in no way obligated to make appearances or attend NFL events.
That being said I think he is taking too much flack for missing the Super Bowl pre-game show. The NFL invioted all of the former SB MVP's and reportedly Joe did not show because he wanted 100K. Everyone has been saying it was bush league for him to do that, or that the NFL gave him everything he should give back, etc...
Joe made himself, the NFL is a for profit business so excuse me if I dont begrudge someone trying to make a profit. Maybe he does not want to be involved with the NFL, that is his choice. He is in no way obligated to make appearances or attend NFL events.
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Modern Civil Rights Movement
As a minority I cringe whenever these phony civil rights leaders open their ignorant mouths. It has not changed. At the King funeral these "civil rights leaders" used the occcasion to insult President Bush. I understand that politics is nasty but have some class because they are denigrating the entire movement. They have been reduced to ignorant whiners.
Monday, February 06, 2006
Friday, February 03, 2006
Muslim Protests
Michelle Malkin has some nice photos from some of the demonstrations against newspapers running cartoons of Muhammed. The scary part is these are pictures from a London protest. The pictures speak for themselves. pics
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Props to Europe (updated)
Say what you will about the courage of the Euros, but it is the European press that has the balls to challenge the muslims. In our country the press and the left will only attack Christianity. For some reason the left is always quiet when it comes to Islam but not in Europe. Papers in France,Germany, Spain and Switzerland have all backed the Danes and repreinted all of the cartoons about the prophet Muhammed (I am not sure on the spelling because it changes all the time). pics
This is courageous and needs to be done. Of course the Muslims are going ape shit. They are boycotting Danish goods and some are escalating to violence. article
CNN does not have the balls to show the photos, they have them blurred out when covering the story.
"A Danish government can never apologise on behalf of a free and independent newspaper. This is basically a dispute between some Muslims and a newspaper," said Danish PM Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
Compare that to the US governments position.
"Inciting religious or ethnic hatred in this manner is not acceptable," said State Department press officer Janelle Hironimus.
Now compare to Egypts ambassador to Denmark
"Mona Omar Attia, Egypt's ambassador to Denmark, said after a meeting with Rasmussen that she was satisfied with the position of the Danish government but noted the prime minister had said he could not interfere with the press. 'This means the whole story will continue and that we are back to square one again. The government of Denmark has to do something to appease the Muslim world,' Attia said."
Do they now?
And to the Arab street.
"Whoever defames our prophet should be executed," said Ismail Hassan, 37, a tailor who marched through the pouring rain along with hundreds of others in the West Bank city of Ramallah.
"Bin Laden our beloved, Denmark must be blown up," protesters in Ramallah chanted.
This is courageous and needs to be done. Of course the Muslims are going ape shit. They are boycotting Danish goods and some are escalating to violence. article
CNN does not have the balls to show the photos, they have them blurred out when covering the story.
"A Danish government can never apologise on behalf of a free and independent newspaper. This is basically a dispute between some Muslims and a newspaper," said Danish PM Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
Compare that to the US governments position.
"Inciting religious or ethnic hatred in this manner is not acceptable," said State Department press officer Janelle Hironimus.
Now compare to Egypts ambassador to Denmark
"Mona Omar Attia, Egypt's ambassador to Denmark, said after a meeting with Rasmussen that she was satisfied with the position of the Danish government but noted the prime minister had said he could not interfere with the press. 'This means the whole story will continue and that we are back to square one again. The government of Denmark has to do something to appease the Muslim world,' Attia said."
Do they now?
And to the Arab street.
"Whoever defames our prophet should be executed," said Ismail Hassan, 37, a tailor who marched through the pouring rain along with hundreds of others in the West Bank city of Ramallah.
"Bin Laden our beloved, Denmark must be blown up," protesters in Ramallah chanted.
Friday, January 27, 2006
Democracy
Since the Hamas victory yesterday, I have heard many talking heads make statements such as, "becareful what you ask for" or "Islam is not compatible with Democracy." It seems that both conservatives and liberals are united in the belief that the Hamas victory proved that Bush was wrong for "pushing Western values on the Middle East."
This is complete BS in my humble opinion. I think it is a human right for people to have a say in their government. Why would anyone oppose voting in the Middle East? Are they scared the radical Islamic parties will win?
I hate to break the news to everyone but the Middle East is already full of radical governments. If there are elections then we know that this is the will of the people not just a minority of radicals. It appears that many would rather condemn a large portion of the worlds' population to subjugation, that is heartbreaking.
This is complete BS in my humble opinion. I think it is a human right for people to have a say in their government. Why would anyone oppose voting in the Middle East? Are they scared the radical Islamic parties will win?
I hate to break the news to everyone but the Middle East is already full of radical governments. If there are elections then we know that this is the will of the people not just a minority of radicals. It appears that many would rather condemn a large portion of the worlds' population to subjugation, that is heartbreaking.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Flatline (updated)
Only two outcomes that I see with the Hamas victory. 1. Israel sets their own border setting off a war between the two with outside parties being drawn in. or 2. Hamas renounces violence and recognizes Israel and world peace breaks out. (cough, cough, this is good shit)
To be clear I dont think that Hamas will just disarm peacefully but rather I could see them becoming intoxicated with power and therefore change there beliefs in order to maintain power.
Regardless this election is huge, but we need to wait for Israeli elections in March to learn the full implication. For the record I think it is positive to have elections everywhere no matter the outcome. I would rather know that the majority of people want an extremist government, than to be told constantly that the people like us it is just the repressive government that does not.
So much more to say but the semester has started and I have HW.
To be clear I dont think that Hamas will just disarm peacefully but rather I could see them becoming intoxicated with power and therefore change there beliefs in order to maintain power.
Regardless this election is huge, but we need to wait for Israeli elections in March to learn the full implication. For the record I think it is positive to have elections everywhere no matter the outcome. I would rather know that the majority of people want an extremist government, than to be told constantly that the people like us it is just the repressive government that does not.
So much more to say but the semester has started and I have HW.
Friday, January 20, 2006
UN Imperialism????
"We don't listen to anybody," said George Kassi, 19, as he hoisted as a stone to throw at the headquarters of the United Nations mission. "We want the complete liberation of Ivory Coast. I won't go home until the U.N. and France leave my country." complete story
I thought the French and the UN were the good guys? Whenever statements such as these come are directed towards the US they are instantly legitimate. These are the same type of statements coming out of France and the UN in regards to the Iraq war.
I know it is popular to say that the only reason that we have any attachment to the Middle East is because of the oil. But to that I say so what! At least we care and are engaged in the region. Africa is more chaotic and worse off than the Middle East. When the Middle East does stabilize (at some point it has to)there will be an even bigger mess in Africa.
I thought the French and the UN were the good guys? Whenever statements such as these come are directed towards the US they are instantly legitimate. These are the same type of statements coming out of France and the UN in regards to the Iraq war.
I know it is popular to say that the only reason that we have any attachment to the Middle East is because of the oil. But to that I say so what! At least we care and are engaged in the region. Africa is more chaotic and worse off than the Middle East. When the Middle East does stabilize (at some point it has to)there will be an even bigger mess in Africa.
Thursday, January 19, 2006
The Truce
Please tell me none of the Democrats will be so stupid as to suggest we discuss Bin Ladens truce? It really saddens me to ask such a dumb question but with Democrats such as Dennis Kucinich or Barabara Lee, I am not sure. tick-tock-tick-tock
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Labor Unions
Labor Union reps in San Francisco were outraged that Gov. Schwarzenneger attended the MLK breakfast. complete story.
This is why I dislike labor unions. Although most people in labor unions are blue collar, conservative people, the leadership has gone extremely left.
This exploitation of MLK by SF unions is disgusting.
This is why I dislike labor unions. Although most people in labor unions are blue collar, conservative people, the leadership has gone extremely left.
This exploitation of MLK by SF unions is disgusting.
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
The Kennedy's
I saw a documentary named "Kennedy's: The Curse of Power"(? at least I think that was the name). Holy Shit, this is a screwed up family. I never realized that the father Joe, was a NAZI sympathizer, nor did I know that he had his daughter get a lobotomy. A FREAKING LOBOTOMY. How anyone from this family was ever elected to position I have no idea.
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Alito & CAP
Alhtough I think Alito seems like a stellar candidate, his denial of any knowledge of his membership in CAP (Concerned Alumni of Princeton) seems, shall we say, tough-to-believe. I would think that he should be able to remember involvement or at least what the club stood for. His continual denial about anyknowledge of the issues that the club cared about is difficult for me to believe. He is an extremely intelligent person and he should remember the club if he thought enough of it to list it in his resume. The Democrats claim the club favors keeping women and minorities enrollment low. It probably means that they oppose affirmative action, which is much different.
After Sen. Kennedy read various quotes from articles in CAP newsletters, Alito denied any knowledge of the articles and distanced himself from the comments. He went further and said he would not have been part of the organization had he known the organization held these views. He claims that he joined because of the schools objectional treatment of the ROTC program.
While I believe that the ROTC was probably a large part of the reason he joined, it seems suspicious to me that he knew nothing else about the club. Kennedy is demanding the committe vote to subpoena the CAP records, this seems reasonable since Alito is denying any active invovlement in the group.
It is important to note that I do not believe his involvement with CAP is bad or should keep him out, just that it is hard for me to believe that he knew nothing of this alumni group that he joined. If he is lying about his involvement then I think that is a reason to vote against him.
(note: I am in agreement with Sen Kennedy, which besides being very troubling to me, also means I could be wrong)
After Sen. Kennedy read various quotes from articles in CAP newsletters, Alito denied any knowledge of the articles and distanced himself from the comments. He went further and said he would not have been part of the organization had he known the organization held these views. He claims that he joined because of the schools objectional treatment of the ROTC program.
While I believe that the ROTC was probably a large part of the reason he joined, it seems suspicious to me that he knew nothing else about the club. Kennedy is demanding the committe vote to subpoena the CAP records, this seems reasonable since Alito is denying any active invovlement in the group.
It is important to note that I do not believe his involvement with CAP is bad or should keep him out, just that it is hard for me to believe that he knew nothing of this alumni group that he joined. If he is lying about his involvement then I think that is a reason to vote against him.
(note: I am in agreement with Sen Kennedy, which besides being very troubling to me, also means I could be wrong)
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Husband's Rights?????
During the Alito hearings today, Dianne Feinstein quoted Justice O’Conner, in reference to Planned Parenthood v Casey, “The state may not give to a man the kind of dominion and control over his wife that parents exercise over their children”. This quote suggested that Alito was equating wives with children when he ruled that married women must notify their husbands before having an abortion. This is and was an attempt to cloud the issue. Feinstein using this quote is her attempt to frame the argument of one of Women’s rights, however it is not so. Marriage is a contract that enforces shared responsibility on all parties. For example, if a woman gets the abortion, something goes wrong, and she needs to go to a real hospital, the husband will be financially responsible for those bills. If she dies, he will incur the cost. Not to mention the fact that the baby is his and he should at least know that this decision is being made. I realize that men do not have the same rights to their unborn children but certainly we are due the respect of notification. Alito simply ruled that a woman notifying her husband did not equate an undue burden save for some exceptions: full text
1. If the husband is not the father of the child
2. If he cannot be found after diligent effort
3. The pregnancy was a result of a spousal sexual assault and the authorities have been notified
4. The notification will lead to bodily harm on the woman
If it is, an undue burden for a wife to tell her husband that she is aborting their child then marriage need not worry about some alleged threat from gays because it is already meaningless.
1. If the husband is not the father of the child
2. If he cannot be found after diligent effort
3. The pregnancy was a result of a spousal sexual assault and the authorities have been notified
4. The notification will lead to bodily harm on the woman
If it is, an undue burden for a wife to tell her husband that she is aborting their child then marriage need not worry about some alleged threat from gays because it is already meaningless.
Friday, January 06, 2006
Sharon's Stroke
What a difference a month makes. This stroke could not have come at a worse time. Sharon (for better or worse) was going to forge ahead on a peace plan even if he had to draw the lines himself. I cannot imagine what the majority of Isrealis are thinking. Sharon was able to transform himself from a right-wing hawk into a centrist working for peace. I cannot remember such a drastic transformation of a political figure in recent times.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
USC vs TEXAS
First off, great game Vince Young played his ass off. But USC clearly got out-coached. If they would have played old school football, kick the ball on the 4th(if 4th and 1 was easy every team would go for it) they would have won. It's 4th down and 2, ball on the 45, USC has a 5 point lead and they go for it????? Bad decision, but understandable because Young was torching their defense and the only way USC could gaurauntee a victory was to keep the ball. They should have punted the ball and made Young go 80 yards regardless. But the decision to go for it on 4th and 1, at the 17, the 17!!!!!!!! The worst coaching decision in a big game that I have evere seen. USC was up 7-0, why in the world would they not kick the field goal????? Lastly, they wasted their last time out on a 2-point conversion play, with only 19 seconds left. Keep the time out!!!!!Their was no need for USC to make a statement or try and finish Texas off in one blow last night. USC was the better team and should have acted like it. Championship teams take points and do not have to take chances like that. Texas, I could understand because they needed something big to win. USC provided the opportunities with the two 4th downs and the Bush lateral. Props to Texas for taking advantage.
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Imagine if...
Bush was the fascist everyone made him out to be. For all of the rhetoric being thrown around you would think that people are being prosecuted just for their writings. Where is the international outrage. For those who do not wish to read, a publisher is in Turkey is facing multiple years in prison for printing a book which describes some Turkish quarters as dirty. Seems reasonable to me. Turkey has some serious house cleaning to do before they should be considered for entrance into the EU.
NY STRIKE
First, I don't see how the union plans on winning this one. They are alienating the people of NY by striking this close before Christmas (not to mention the weather), a judge has imposed a $1 million a day fine???? I think that the Government should either not allow unions for government employees or let them strike. If a union is not allowed to strike then are they really a union. Sort of like the Chinese being referred to as communists. You cant be a free market communist! If a union cannot strike, how is it a union?
Intelligent Design
It seems that the court ruled right in this case. Intelligent design has no place in public schools, it is not hard science, it is not testable therefore leave it to the parents.
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Sharon Vs Likud
Sharon has pulled out of the party he helped form and has embraced Shimon Perez an old political foe. It is too early for me to have an informed response but I will have much more to say because this is a huge development. My gut reaction is to believe Sharon has Israels best intersest at heart, but he is a politician.
Saturday, October 22, 2005
Hate Crimes
I am no fan of hate crime legislation because I believe it is dangerously close to criminalizing thoughts. That being said, if it is law is should not be applied selectively. It seems the legislation is only intended for white criminals. For example, about two weeks ago six Mexican immigrants were killed by three African Americans, yet the police are quick to say this is not a hate crime. I wonder how law enforcement can tell the motives of the murderers so quickly. (In the interest of full discolsure, I am an American of Mexican descent. There is no doubt in my mind that if the suspects were white this story would be front page of every paper and tv show. As it is, I only heard of this story about 4 days ago. If hate crime legislation is good for the whites then it should be good for minorities, as well.
Friday, October 14, 2005
Sorry Roy
Seeing how I am the major reader of my blog, I would like to apologize to myself for not posting regularly. I have been having an extremely busy semester at school with alot of reading and writing assingments. I will try and be more dedicated (once I get time).
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
China gains another ally
China has been running an excellent PR campaign the past few years and now it seems to be paying off. Australia has recently begun to seperate its policy on China from that of the U.S.
"in general terms it was made clear that in the unlikely event of a conflict over Taiwan, the US doesn't automatically expect military support from Australia."
At this point I am not so sure the U.S government is ready to tussle over Taiwan. The government rhetoric has been greatly toned down over the past few years. In October of 2004, Colin Powell said
"There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, and that remains our policy, our firm policy."
If I were in Taiwan I would not hold my breath for U.S support. They need to go nuclear and fast. If we do nothing while China takes Taiwan by force then we can kiss all of our Asian influence goodbye. (South Korea, and bases in the "Stans")
"in general terms it was made clear that in the unlikely event of a conflict over Taiwan, the US doesn't automatically expect military support from Australia."
At this point I am not so sure the U.S government is ready to tussle over Taiwan. The government rhetoric has been greatly toned down over the past few years. In October of 2004, Colin Powell said
"There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, and that remains our policy, our firm policy."
If I were in Taiwan I would not hold my breath for U.S support. They need to go nuclear and fast. If we do nothing while China takes Taiwan by force then we can kiss all of our Asian influence goodbye. (South Korea, and bases in the "Stans")
Friday, September 16, 2005
California Bans Junk Food in Schools
Begining next fall students at California schools (elementary-high school)will no longer sell soda, candy or other junk food. The lunches will also begin having more fruit and vegetables.
It is about time! I think it is horrible the way the schools feed the children. If only parents would take an interest in the food their children eat we might not have to put every child on ridalin.
It is about time! I think it is horrible the way the schools feed the children. If only parents would take an interest in the food their children eat we might not have to put every child on ridalin.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Palastinians Murder Arafat
Palastinian militants drug Moussa Arafat out of his home and murdered him in order to punish him for alleged corruption during his days as a seurity chief. The militants claimed they punished him because Abbas did not and that they will be enforcing gods law. Abbas needs to gain control over this country with force. He must disarm the terror groups operating in Gaza and the West Bank. If he cannot control the groups then he needs to call on his Islamic friends, (Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia ...) to provide troops and help him dismantle these groups. His plan to bring these terror groups into Palastinian politics could be disasterous. He is showing weakness and they are pouncing on his weaknesses. Of course all of this could be playing right into Israels hand. If Gaza descends into furhter chaos there is no way Israel can give up the West Bank.
Friday, September 02, 2005
Chaos in N.O
After witnessing the total incompetence to control the situation in New Orleans, one has to wonder what would happen if there were a terror attack using WMD's. The total lack of preparation seems ridiculous. The federal and state governments have allegedly been preparing for massive terror attacks yet they cannot get this situation under control?
If people are raping, looting and causing hhavok what would they do after a WMD attack. Maybe it is a good idea to purchase a gun if you have not already done so.
If people are raping, looting and causing hhavok what would they do after a WMD attack. Maybe it is a good idea to purchase a gun if you have not already done so.
Thursday, September 01, 2005
Bush Flooded New Orleans!!!!
Or so I have been reading on the internet. I did however find this article from 2000 which discusses the levee system.
This did not come out of nowhere, these levee's haev been an accident waiting to happen for years so to blame Bush or the war is nonsense. Here is the most telling quote.
"If it were left to residents and city officials, the status quo would prevail. One city official says of the flooding and subsidence, "We are below sea level and we do get floods sometimes, but it's not a real serious problem. You can still purchase flood insurance." Another city official expressed faith in the current levee system."
So my question to all of you Bush haters is, have you no shame?
This did not come out of nowhere, these levee's haev been an accident waiting to happen for years so to blame Bush or the war is nonsense. Here is the most telling quote.
"If it were left to residents and city officials, the status quo would prevail. One city official says of the flooding and subsidence, "We are below sea level and we do get floods sometimes, but it's not a real serious problem. You can still purchase flood insurance." Another city official expressed faith in the current levee system."
So my question to all of you Bush haters is, have you no shame?
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
New Orleans Parish Prison
I must admit I am a news junkie, but there are two stories I cannot get into natural disasters and missing person stories. It is not that I do not symapthize with the victims of Katrina or that I do not believe it is news worthy it just bores me. It is not news that the south east has hurricanes so people live there at their own risk. It is not as if this is the first year of hurricanes. That being said it is probably not the time to debate this as there are still many people suffering through this disaster.
Interestingly enough there was one story which has been buried which is interesting. There are reports that inmates at New Orleans Parish Prison have taken control of the prison and have a guard, his wife and four children hostage.
The problem is that there is no media in this area to confirm these reports. IT appears the inmates want food, water and survival. I am no prison apologist but I do believe that it is human nature to survive and do whatever it takes to survive. If these prisoners have been left to their own device to drown or starve then taking control of the prison seems to be a logical step if they just want food and water. If they are attempting to exploit the situation by rioting and hoping to escape they should be severely punished. However rioting for food, water and survival seems to be alright to me. If I was left in a flooded building I would do whatever was necessary tro survive.
Interestingly enough there was one story which has been buried which is interesting. There are reports that inmates at New Orleans Parish Prison have taken control of the prison and have a guard, his wife and four children hostage.
The problem is that there is no media in this area to confirm these reports. IT appears the inmates want food, water and survival. I am no prison apologist but I do believe that it is human nature to survive and do whatever it takes to survive. If these prisoners have been left to their own device to drown or starve then taking control of the prison seems to be a logical step if they just want food and water. If they are attempting to exploit the situation by rioting and hoping to escape they should be severely punished. However rioting for food, water and survival seems to be alright to me. If I was left in a flooded building I would do whatever was necessary tro survive.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
SUV's
Andrew Sullivan.com is going OJ on SUV's today. The general crux of the aruement is SUV's use more gas and therefore they directly help in the funding of roque nations such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. Andrews site is even having a contest for the best anti-suv bumper sticker. Is this an accurate assesment?
I think not. There is no doubt that America is a gas loving and consuming nation. We consume enough energy for many nations. If we were to begin monitoring and conserving oil then we could start to untangle our country from these bad regimes. On its face it sounds good, but it is a little naive.
Asia is consuming energy at enormous rates and there consumption will surpass ours in the near future. Their demand for energy can be seen in China's willingness to pay more than market value for an American energy company. The market for oil goes way beyond SUV's and America.
America divorcing themselves from less than friendly oil nations would do nothing to solve any problems going on in the Middle East. To be sure the countries would feel a slight hit if we stopped purchasing their product but there are plenty of addicts to make sure they have large bank accounts. Am I supposed to believe that without US dollars the region is magically going to become a peaceful region? Maybe if we quit purchasing their oil they will begin to direct their anger at Asia?
The most likely scenario for the Middle East with out American engagement is a worsening of human rights violations (if possible)and a further disconnect from the rest of the world. Picture Africa, no oil nobody(no Americans) cares what happens in the Sudan or Liberia or anywhere in Sub-Sahharan Africa. This would truly be a tragic event.
Oil is the only connection the Middle East has with the rest of the world if they did not have this connection then we could grant these compassionate anti-war protestors their wish and allow the Middle East to terrorize their public without so much as a 1 minute headline sandwiched in between a celbrity break-up and missing person story.
I think not. There is no doubt that America is a gas loving and consuming nation. We consume enough energy for many nations. If we were to begin monitoring and conserving oil then we could start to untangle our country from these bad regimes. On its face it sounds good, but it is a little naive.
Asia is consuming energy at enormous rates and there consumption will surpass ours in the near future. Their demand for energy can be seen in China's willingness to pay more than market value for an American energy company. The market for oil goes way beyond SUV's and America.
America divorcing themselves from less than friendly oil nations would do nothing to solve any problems going on in the Middle East. To be sure the countries would feel a slight hit if we stopped purchasing their product but there are plenty of addicts to make sure they have large bank accounts. Am I supposed to believe that without US dollars the region is magically going to become a peaceful region? Maybe if we quit purchasing their oil they will begin to direct their anger at Asia?
The most likely scenario for the Middle East with out American engagement is a worsening of human rights violations (if possible)and a further disconnect from the rest of the world. Picture Africa, no oil nobody(no Americans) cares what happens in the Sudan or Liberia or anywhere in Sub-Sahharan Africa. This would truly be a tragic event.
Oil is the only connection the Middle East has with the rest of the world if they did not have this connection then we could grant these compassionate anti-war protestors their wish and allow the Middle East to terrorize their public without so much as a 1 minute headline sandwiched in between a celbrity break-up and missing person story.
Monday, August 15, 2005
Zarqawi Aid Killed!!!!
Iraqi forces have killed a top aid of public enemy #1 Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.
I must be in the wrong business, Zarqawi has more top aids than a CEO of an evil multinational corporation. Unfortunately for Zarqawi it seems that good help is hard to find they cannot keep themselves alive long enough to get promoted.
I must be in the wrong business, Zarqawi has more top aids than a CEO of an evil multinational corporation. Unfortunately for Zarqawi it seems that good help is hard to find they cannot keep themselves alive long enough to get promoted.
Friday, August 12, 2005
State of Emergency in New Mexico
New Mexico's governor Bill Richardson declared a state of emergency due to the lack of border control. Richardson claims there are drugs being smuggled in, cattle being attacked and crimes being committed due to illegal immigration.
Props to Richardson for taking this bold step. I say bold not because the people reject this plan but because his party and liberal base do not support closing the border. Of course the majority of Americans and especially us living in the border states completely support this move and welcome the rest of the border state governors to do the same.
This came after a huge battle in SoCal over illegal immigration. Unfortunately the hispanic left came out to call everyone who supports sensible border measures a racist. As an American of Mexican descent it embarrasses me to no end to see the hispanic left. Void of any arguments and reduced solely to name calling. I believe the majority of clear thinking hispanics want sensible border policies. Illegal immigration hurts Mexicans more than anyother group of people. This is because the legal immigrants must compete directly with illegal immigrants.
Anyone that lives in a state consumed by illegal immigration realizes that the illegal immigrants are taking jobs that Americans due want such as construction,
painting and landscaping.
Republicans should beware of the democrats outflanking them on immigration thereby taking many voters who care deeply about this issue.
Props to Richardson for taking this bold step. I say bold not because the people reject this plan but because his party and liberal base do not support closing the border. Of course the majority of Americans and especially us living in the border states completely support this move and welcome the rest of the border state governors to do the same.
This came after a huge battle in SoCal over illegal immigration. Unfortunately the hispanic left came out to call everyone who supports sensible border measures a racist. As an American of Mexican descent it embarrasses me to no end to see the hispanic left. Void of any arguments and reduced solely to name calling. I believe the majority of clear thinking hispanics want sensible border policies. Illegal immigration hurts Mexicans more than anyother group of people. This is because the legal immigrants must compete directly with illegal immigrants.
Anyone that lives in a state consumed by illegal immigration realizes that the illegal immigrants are taking jobs that Americans due want such as construction,
painting and landscaping.
Republicans should beware of the democrats outflanking them on immigration thereby taking many voters who care deeply about this issue.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
I said no salt
It appears that wife beating is a national sport in sub-Saharan Africa. The NYT reported that a majority of men and many women believe that beating your wife is justified if she is disobedient. Here is the best quote in the article.
"To Kenny Adebayo, a 30-year-old driver in Lagos, the issue is clear-cut. "If you tell your wife she puts too much salt in the dinner, and every day, every day, every day there is too much salt, one day you will get emotional and hurt her," he said. "We men in Africa hate disrespect."
This is multi-culturalism I can dig!
"To Kenny Adebayo, a 30-year-old driver in Lagos, the issue is clear-cut. "If you tell your wife she puts too much salt in the dinner, and every day, every day, every day there is too much salt, one day you will get emotional and hurt her," he said. "We men in Africa hate disrespect."
This is multi-culturalism I can dig!
T.O
It seems as Terrell Owens is now public enemy #1, the talk show callers have decided TO needs to stop being greedy and be a man and honor the contract he signed. The only problem is the people who are saying this are ignorant. I have not heard one of these ignorant people calling in and saying the owners need to be men and honor the contract they sign. For example, Peter Warrick was just informed he needs to accept a pay cut or be cut from the team. Or is a contract only a contract when the player signs it.
Next the issue of greed. Are athletes greedy? Sure, but so is the management and every other red blooded capitalist. I have season tickets to the Oakland Raiders and the parking, concessions and ticket prices are always being raised. The owners are not an altruistic bunch of people just looking to help innercity kids become wealthy.
The same hysteria was made about Ricky Williams suddenly retiring before last season. Ricky was made out to be the biggest piece of crap around. People said he betrayed the Dolphins, he betrayed his teammates, etc... I would like to know how much notice Ricky was going to receive when the Dolphins were done with him. Certainly not 1 year, probably not more than 1 month if that.
Where are all the critics going to be when TO is cut before he ever gets to collect the money back loaded in his contract?
Next the issue of greed. Are athletes greedy? Sure, but so is the management and every other red blooded capitalist. I have season tickets to the Oakland Raiders and the parking, concessions and ticket prices are always being raised. The owners are not an altruistic bunch of people just looking to help innercity kids become wealthy.
The same hysteria was made about Ricky Williams suddenly retiring before last season. Ricky was made out to be the biggest piece of crap around. People said he betrayed the Dolphins, he betrayed his teammates, etc... I would like to know how much notice Ricky was going to receive when the Dolphins were done with him. Certainly not 1 year, probably not more than 1 month if that.
Where are all the critics going to be when TO is cut before he ever gets to collect the money back loaded in his contract?
Thursday, August 04, 2005
Private Property????
A homeowner in Wisconsin placed a blue big bird on his roof. The neighbors complained and went to the city officials to get the bird removed. The man was threatened with a fine of $100 a day.
Laws like this are the threat to private property, they can force certain lawn standards, or forbid flags or birds. The immenent domain ruling by the Supreme Court was only the next logical step. People are so concerned about property values they see nothing wrong with forcing their rules on their community they should not be upset when the courts rule against private property in order to raise money.
Laws like this are the threat to private property, they can force certain lawn standards, or forbid flags or birds. The immenent domain ruling by the Supreme Court was only the next logical step. People are so concerned about property values they see nothing wrong with forcing their rules on their community they should not be upset when the courts rule against private property in order to raise money.
ACLU sues NY
The ACLU has sued NY over the random bag searches, claiming they are unconstitutional. The ACLU had better hope that the subways do not get bombed because if they are the ACLU might be lynched. I am not a fan of random bag searches, I believe profiling should be used to determine wether or not someone should be seatched. For example,a 90 year old lady should be profiled as not a terrorist. Profiling may be not be fool proof but it is better than random searches.
Isreali soldier
An Israeli soldier who had deserted his post in protest of the Gaza pullout went on a shooting spree against Arab-Israelis. The soldier was killed by the crowd of horrified onlookers. Arab-Israelis are claiming the police did not sufficiently stop the soldier.
Unfortunately this could be a more common occurance if governments are unable or refuse to provide legitimate security for its population. If you recall last September 12 workers from Nepal were murdered in Iraq and the Nepalese people went ape shit, burning Mosques, sacking muslim owned stores and chanting anti-islamic phrases. If there is another significant attack here I think we will see an increase in vigilante justice.
The Arabs are claiming this is a terrorist attack and were outraged. If only they could be so outraged when it is the Jews who are being bombed, then this problem could be over sooner rather than later.
Unfortunately this could be a more common occurance if governments are unable or refuse to provide legitimate security for its population. If you recall last September 12 workers from Nepal were murdered in Iraq and the Nepalese people went ape shit, burning Mosques, sacking muslim owned stores and chanting anti-islamic phrases. If there is another significant attack here I think we will see an increase in vigilante justice.
The Arabs are claiming this is a terrorist attack and were outraged. If only they could be so outraged when it is the Jews who are being bombed, then this problem could be over sooner rather than later.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Gray on Friedman
John Gray takes some shots at Friedmans book "The World is flat".
I must admit that I am a fan of Thomas Friedman and his "neo-liberal" view. I believe that globalization and free markets will lead to a more peaceful and more just world.
Gray writes "Over the past two hundred years, the spread of capitalism and industrialization has gone hand in hand with war and revolution. It is a fact that would not have surprised Marx. Why do Friedman and other neoliberals believe things will be any different in the twenty-first century?"
This is a classic canned argument that can be used against any theory or any time period. Why? Because there have always been wars and revolutions! Violence is a function of humanity. Evidence of wars can be found in every culture on every continent in every time period.(except maybe Tibet, but then we see how good that worked out for them)
I must admit that I am a fan of Thomas Friedman and his "neo-liberal" view. I believe that globalization and free markets will lead to a more peaceful and more just world.
Gray writes "Over the past two hundred years, the spread of capitalism and industrialization has gone hand in hand with war and revolution. It is a fact that would not have surprised Marx. Why do Friedman and other neoliberals believe things will be any different in the twenty-first century?"
This is a classic canned argument that can be used against any theory or any time period. Why? Because there have always been wars and revolutions! Violence is a function of humanity. Evidence of wars can be found in every culture on every continent in every time period.(except maybe Tibet, but then we see how good that worked out for them)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)